Comparison of an improved Penman-Monteith model and SWH model for estimating evapotranspiration in a meadow wetland in a semiarid region.

Accurately estimating evapotranspiration (ET) for meadow wetland ecosystems is of great significance for water management in semiarid regions. Taking a meadow wetland ecosystem in the Horqin Sandy Land as an example, this study coupled the Ball-Berry canopy stomatal conductance model to Penman-Monteith (P-M) model and Shuttleworth-Wallace (S-W) model, and the improved P-M model and SWH model were calibrated and validated by long-term (2013-2018 growing seasons) eddy covariance (EC) measurements. The results indicated that the improved P-M model and SWH model performed well either at half-hourly or daily timescales, with high coefficient of determination (R ² ) and index of agreement (IA) and low root mean square error (RMSE). Generally, the SWH model performed better than the improved P-M model, especially under the low leaf area index (LAI) conditions. In addition, in the growing seasons from 2013 to 2018, the mean ET measured by the EC system was 2.78 mm/d, which was approximately equal to the mean modeled ET from the SWH model (2.75 mm/d) and slightly higher than the mean modeled ET from the improved P-M model (2.34 mm/d). The improved P-M model and SWH model were highly sensitive to the parameter in estimating canopy surface resistance and to vapor pressure deficit (VPD) in meteorological variables.
Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest The authors declare no conflicts of interest.
(Copyright © 2021 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)