Back to Search Start Over

Anorectal dose-effect relations for late gastrointestinal toxicity following external beam radiotherapy for prostate cancer in the FLAME trial.

Authors :
Groen VH
Zuithoff NPA
van Schie M
Monninkhof EM
Kunze-Busch M
de Boer HCJ
van der Voort van Zyp J
Pos FJ
Smeenk RJ
Haustermans K
Isebaert S
Draulans C
Depuydt T
Verkooijen HM
van der Heide UA
Kerkmeijer LGW
Source :
Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology [Radiother Oncol] 2021 Sep; Vol. 162, pp. 98-104. Date of Electronic Publication: 2021 Jun 29.
Publication Year :
2021

Abstract

Background and Purpose: The phase III FLAME trial (NCT01168479) showed an increase in five-year biochemical disease-free survival, with no significant increase in toxicity when adding a focal boost to external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) for localized prostate cancer [Kerkmeijer et al. JCO 2021]. The aim of this study was to investigate the association between delivered radiation dose to the anorectum and gastrointestinal (GI) toxicity (grade ≥2).<br />Material and Methods: All patients in the FLAME trial were analyzed, irrespective of treatment arm. The dose-effect relation of the anorectal dose parameters (D2cm <superscript>3</superscript> and D50%) and GI toxicity grade ≥2 in four years of follow-up was assessed using a mixed model analysis for repeated measurements, adjusted for age, cardiovascular disease, diabetes mellitus, T-stage, baseline toxicity grade ≥1, hormonal therapy and institute.<br />Results: A dose-effect relation for D2cm <superscript>3</superscript> and D50% was observed with adjusted odds ratios of 1.17 (95% CI 1.13-1.21, p < 0.0001) and 1.20 (95% CI 1.14-1.25, p < 0.0001) for GI toxicity, respectively.<br />Conclusion: Although there was no difference in toxicity between study arms, a higher radiation dose to the anorectum was associated with a statistically significant increase in GI toxicity following EBRT for prostate cancer. This dose-effect relation was present for both large and small anorectal volumes. Therefore, further increase in dose to the anorectum should be weighed against the benefit of focal dose escalation for prostate cancer.<br />Competing Interests: Conflict of interest statement All authors declare having no conflict of interest related to the content of this manuscript.<br /> (Copyright © 2021 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
1879-0887
Volume :
162
Database :
MEDLINE
Journal :
Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
34214614
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.radonc.2021.06.033