Back to Search
Start Over
Association of Chemotherapy, Enzalutamide, Abiraterone, and Radium 223 With Cognitive Function in Older Men With Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer.
- Source :
-
JAMA network open [JAMA Netw Open] 2021 Jul 01; Vol. 4 (7), pp. e2114694. Date of Electronic Publication: 2021 Jul 01. - Publication Year :
- 2021
-
Abstract
- Importance: Older adults are at greater risk of cognitive decline with various oncologic therapies. Some commonly used therapies for advanced prostate cancer, such as enzalutamide, have been linked to cognitive impairment, but published data are scarce, come from single-group studies, or focus on self-reported cognition.<br />Objective: To longitudinally examine the association between cognitive function and docetaxel (chemotherapy), abiraterone, enzalutamide, and radium Ra 223 dichloride (radium 223) in older men with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer.<br />Design, Setting, and Participants: A multicenter, prospective, observational cohort study was conducted across 4 academic cancer centers in Ontario, Canada. A consecutive sample of 155 men age 65 years or older with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer starting any treatment with docetaxel, abiraterone acetate, enzalutamide, or radium Ra 223 dichloride (radium 223) were enrolled between July 1, 2015, and December 31, 2019.<br />Exposures: First-line chemotherapy (docetaxel), abiraterone, enzalutamide, or radium 223.<br />Main Outcomes and Measures: Cognitive function was measured at baseline and end of treatment using the Montreal Cognitive Assessment, the Trail Making Test part A, and the Trail Making Test part B to assess global cognition, attention, and executive function, respectively. Absolute changes in scores over time were analyzed using univariate and multivariable linear regression, and the percentages of individuals with a decline of 1.5 SDs in each domain were calculated.<br />Results: A total of 155 men starting treatment with docetaxel (n = 51) (mean [SD] age, 73.5 [6.2] years; 34 [66.7%] with some postsecondary education), abiraterone (n = 29) (mean [SD] age, 76.2 [7.2] years; 18 [62.1%] with some postsecondary education), enzalutamide (n = 54) (mean [SD] age, 75.7 [7.4] years; 33 [61.1%] with some postsecondary education), and radium 223 (n = 21) (mean [SD] age, 76.4 [7.2] years; 17 [81.0%] with some postsecondary education) were included. Most patients had stable cognition or slight improvements during treatment. A cognitive decline of 1.5 SDs or more was observed in 0% to 6.5% of patients on each measure of cognitive function (eg, 3 of 46 patients [6.5%; 95% CI, 2.2%-17.5%] in the group receiving chemotherapy [docetaxel] had a decline of 1.5 SDs for Trails A and Trails B). Although patients taking enzalutamide had numerically larger declines than those taking abiraterone, differences were small and clinically unimportant.<br />Conclusions and Relevance: These findings suggest that most older men do not experience significant cognitive decline in attention, executive function, and global cognition while undergoing treatment for advanced prostate cancer regardless of the treatment used.
- Subjects :
- Aged
Aged, 80 and over
Androstenes administration & dosage
Benzamides administration & dosage
Drug Therapy methods
Drug Therapy statistics & numerical data
Humans
Male
Neoplasm Metastasis drug therapy
Nitriles administration & dosage
Phenylthiohydantoin administration & dosage
Prostatic Neoplasms, Castration-Resistant psychology
Radioisotopes administration & dosage
Radioisotopes adverse effects
Radium administration & dosage
Androstenes adverse effects
Benzamides adverse effects
Cognition drug effects
Nitriles adverse effects
Phenylthiohydantoin adverse effects
Prostatic Neoplasms, Castration-Resistant drug therapy
Radium adverse effects
Subjects
Details
- Language :
- English
- ISSN :
- 2574-3805
- Volume :
- 4
- Issue :
- 7
- Database :
- MEDLINE
- Journal :
- JAMA network open
- Publication Type :
- Academic Journal
- Accession number :
- 34213559
- Full Text :
- https://doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.14694