Back to Search Start Over

Evaluation of skin reactions during proton beam radiotherapy - Patient-reported versus clinician-reported.

Authors :
Möllerberg ML
Langegård U
Johansson B
Ohlsson-Nevo E
Fransson P
Ahlberg K
Witt-Nyström P
Sjövall K
Source :
Technical innovations & patient support in radiation oncology [Tech Innov Patient Support Radiat Oncol] 2021 Jun 19; Vol. 19, pp. 11-17. Date of Electronic Publication: 2021 Jun 19 (Print Publication: 2021).
Publication Year :
2021

Abstract

Background: Skin reaction is a common side-effect of radiotherapy and often only assessed as clinician-reported outcome (CRO). The aim was to examine and compare patient-reported outcome (PRO) of skin reactions with CRO for signs of acute skin reactions for patients with primary brain tumour receiving proton beam radiotherapy (PBT). A further aim was to explore patients' experiences of the skin reactions.<br />Methods: Acute skin reactions were assessed one week after start of treatment, mid-treatment and end of treatment among 253 patients with primary brain tumour who underwent PBT. PRO skin reactions were assessed with the RSAS and CRO according to the RTOG scale. Fleiss' kappa was performed to measure the inter-rater agreement of the assessments of skin reactions.<br />Results: The results showed a discrepancy between PRO and CRO acute skin reactions. Radiation dose was associated with increased skin reactions, but no correlations were seen for age, gender, education, occupation, other treatment or smoking. There was a poor agreement between patients and clinicians (κ = -0.016) one week after the start of PBT, poor (κ = -0.045) to (κ = 0.396) moderate agreement at mid treatment and poor (κ = -0.010) to (κ = 0.296) moderate agreement at end of treatment. Generally, patients' symptom distress toward skin reactions was low at all time points.<br />Conclusion: The poor agreement between PRO and CRO shows that the patient needs to be involved in assessments of skin reactions for a more complete understanding of skin reactions due to PBT. This may also improve patient experience regarding involvement in their own care.<br />Competing Interests: The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.<br /> (© 2021 The Author(s).)

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
2405-6324
Volume :
19
Database :
MEDLINE
Journal :
Technical innovations & patient support in radiation oncology
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
34195393
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tipsro.2021.05.001