Multi-shot Diffusion-Weighted MRI With Multiplexed Sensitivity Encoding (MUSE) in the Assessment of Active Inflammation in Crohn's Disease.

Background: Single-shot diffusion-weighted imaging (ssDWI) has been shown useful for detecting active bowel inflammation in Crohn's disease (CD) without MRI contrast. However, ssDWI suffers from geometric distortion and low spatial resolution.
Purpose: To compare conventional ssDWI with higher-resolution ssDWI (HR-ssDWI) and multi-shot DWI based on multiplexed sensitivity encoding (MUSE-DWI) for evaluating bowel inflammation in CD, using contrast-enhanced MR imaging (CE-MRI) as the reference standard.
Study Type: Prospective.
Subjects: Eighty nine patients with histological diagnosis of CD from previous endoscopy (55 male/34 female, age: 17-69 years). FIELD STRENGTH/SEQUENCES: ssDWI (2.7 mm × 2.7 mm), HR-ssDWI (1.8 mm × 1.8 mm), MUSE-DWI (1.8 mm × 1.8 mm) based on echo-planar imaging, T2-weighted imaging, and CE-MRI sequences, all at 1.5 T.
Assessment: Five raters independently evaluated the tissue texture conspicuity, geometry accuracy, minimization of artifacts, diagnostic confidence, and overall image quality using 5-point Likert scales. The diagnostic performance (sensitivity, specificity and accuracy) of each DWI sequences was assessed on per-bowel-segment basis.
Statistical Tests: Inter-rater agreement for qualitative evaluation of each parameter was measured by the intra-class correlation coefficient (ICC). Paired Wilcoxon signed-rank tests were performed to evaluate the statistical significance of differences in qualitative scoring between DWI sequences. A P value <0.05 was considered to be statistically significant.
Results: Tissue texture conspicuity, geometric distortions, and overall image quality were significantly better for MUSE-DWI than for ssDWI and HR-ssDWI with good agreement among five raters (ICC: 0.70-0.89). HR-ssDWI showed significantly poorer performance to ssDWI and MUSE-DWI for all qualitative scores and had the worst diagnostic performance (sensitivity of 57.0% and accuracy of 87.3%, with 36 undiagnosable cases due to severe artifacts). MUSE-DWI showed significantly higher sensitivity (97.5% vs. 86.1%) and accuracy (98.9% vs. 95.1%) than ssDWI for detecting bowel inflammation.
Data Conclusion: MUSE-DWI was advantageous in assessing bowel inflammation in CD, resulting in improved spatial resolution and image quality.
Level of Evidence: 2 TECHNICAL EFFICACY STAGE: 2.
(© 2021 International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine.)