Back to Search Start Over

Evaluation of a Commercial Culture-Free Neutralization Antibody Detection Kit for Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome-Related Coronavirus-2 and Comparison With an Antireceptor-Binding Domain Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay.

Authors :
Papenburg J
Cheng MP
Corsini R
Caya C
Mendoza E
Manguiat K
Lindsay LR
Wood H
Drebot MA
Dibernardo A
Zaharatos G
Bazin R
Gasser R
Benlarbi M
Gendron-Lepage G
Beaudoin-Bussières G
Prévost J
Finzi A
Ndao M
Yansouni CP
Source :
Open forum infectious diseases [Open Forum Infect Dis] 2021 Apr 30; Vol. 8 (6), pp. ofab220. Date of Electronic Publication: 2021 Apr 30 (Print Publication: 2021).
Publication Year :
2021

Abstract

Background: Severe acute respiratory syndrome-related coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) surrogate neutralization assays that obviate the need for viral culture offer substantial advantages regarding throughput and cost. The cPass SARS-CoV-2 Neutralization Antibody Detection Kit (GenScript) is the first such commercially available assay that detects antibodies that block receptor-binding domain (RBD)/angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE)-2 interaction. We aimed to evaluate cPass to inform its use and assess its added value compared with anti-RBD enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays (ELISAs).<br />Methods: Serum reference panels comprising 205 specimens were used to compare cPass to plaque-reduction neutralization test (PRNT) and a pseudotyped lentiviral neutralization (PLV) assay for detection of neutralizing antibodies. We assessed the correlation of cPass with an ELISA detecting anti-RBD immunoglobulin (Ig)G, IgM, and IgA antibodies at a single timepoint and across intervals from onset of symptoms of SARS-CoV-2 infection.<br />Results: Compared with PRNT-50, cPass sensitivity ranged from 77% to 100% and specificity was 95% to 100%. Sensitivity was also high compared with the pseudotyped lentiviral neutralization assay (93%; 95% confidence interval [CI], 85-97), but specificity was lower (58%; 95% CI, 48-67). Highest agreement between cPass and ELISA was for anti-RBD IgG ( r = 0.823). Against the pseudotyped lentiviral neutralization assay, anti-RBD IgG sensitivity (99%; 95% CI, 94-100) was very similar to that of cPass, but overall specificity was lower (37%; 95% CI, 28-47). Against PRNT-50, results of cPass and anti-RBD IgG were nearly identical.<br />Conclusions: The added value of cPass compared with an IgG anti-RBD ELISA was modest.<br /> (© The Author(s) 2021. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Infectious Diseases Society of America.)

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
2328-8957
Volume :
8
Issue :
6
Database :
MEDLINE
Journal :
Open forum infectious diseases
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
34136587
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofab220