Back to Search
Start Over
Evaluation of a Commercial Culture-Free Neutralization Antibody Detection Kit for Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome-Related Coronavirus-2 and Comparison With an Antireceptor-Binding Domain Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay.
- Source :
-
Open forum infectious diseases [Open Forum Infect Dis] 2021 Apr 30; Vol. 8 (6), pp. ofab220. Date of Electronic Publication: 2021 Apr 30 (Print Publication: 2021). - Publication Year :
- 2021
-
Abstract
- Background: Severe acute respiratory syndrome-related coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) surrogate neutralization assays that obviate the need for viral culture offer substantial advantages regarding throughput and cost. The cPass SARS-CoV-2 Neutralization Antibody Detection Kit (GenScript) is the first such commercially available assay that detects antibodies that block receptor-binding domain (RBD)/angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE)-2 interaction. We aimed to evaluate cPass to inform its use and assess its added value compared with anti-RBD enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays (ELISAs).<br />Methods: Serum reference panels comprising 205 specimens were used to compare cPass to plaque-reduction neutralization test (PRNT) and a pseudotyped lentiviral neutralization (PLV) assay for detection of neutralizing antibodies. We assessed the correlation of cPass with an ELISA detecting anti-RBD immunoglobulin (Ig)G, IgM, and IgA antibodies at a single timepoint and across intervals from onset of symptoms of SARS-CoV-2 infection.<br />Results: Compared with PRNT-50, cPass sensitivity ranged from 77% to 100% and specificity was 95% to 100%. Sensitivity was also high compared with the pseudotyped lentiviral neutralization assay (93%; 95% confidence interval [CI], 85-97), but specificity was lower (58%; 95% CI, 48-67). Highest agreement between cPass and ELISA was for anti-RBD IgG ( r = 0.823). Against the pseudotyped lentiviral neutralization assay, anti-RBD IgG sensitivity (99%; 95% CI, 94-100) was very similar to that of cPass, but overall specificity was lower (37%; 95% CI, 28-47). Against PRNT-50, results of cPass and anti-RBD IgG were nearly identical.<br />Conclusions: The added value of cPass compared with an IgG anti-RBD ELISA was modest.<br /> (© The Author(s) 2021. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Infectious Diseases Society of America.)
Details
- Language :
- English
- ISSN :
- 2328-8957
- Volume :
- 8
- Issue :
- 6
- Database :
- MEDLINE
- Journal :
- Open forum infectious diseases
- Publication Type :
- Academic Journal
- Accession number :
- 34136587
- Full Text :
- https://doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofab220