Back to Search Start Over

Are antimicrobial stewardship interventions effective and safe in long-term care facilities? A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors :
Crespo-Rivas JC
Guisado-Gil AB
Peñalva G
Rodríguez-Villodres Á
Martín-Gandul C
Pachón-Ibáñez ME
Lepe JA
Cisneros JM
Source :
Clinical microbiology and infection : the official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases [Clin Microbiol Infect] 2021 Oct; Vol. 27 (10), pp. 1431-1438. Date of Electronic Publication: 2021 Jun 10.
Publication Year :
2021

Abstract

Background: Long-term care facilities (LTCFs) are health-care settings with high antimicrobial consumption and hence need to develop effective antimicrobial stewardship programmes (ASPs).<br />Objective: To assess the effects of ASPs on care-related, clinical and ecological outcomes in LTCFs.<br />Methods: Data sources were PubMed, EMBASE, CINAHL and SCOPUS. Study eligibility criteria were original research articles (controlled clinical trials or controlled before and after studies) published up to 1 October 2020. Participants were adult residents of LTCFs, residential aged-care facilities, nursing homes, veterans' homes, skilled nursing facilities and assisted living facilities for older people. Interventions included ASPs versus standard care. Outcomes assessed were antimicrobial consumption and appropriateness, infections, hospital admissions and mortality. Available data were pooled in a meta-analysis, and inconsistency between studies was evaluated using the I <superscript>2</superscript> statistic. Certainty of evidence was assessed using the GRADE approach.<br />Results: Of the 3111 papers identified, 12 studies met the inclusion criteria. All of them analysed the impact of interventions on antimicrobial use based on consumption-related variables (n = 8) and/or percentage of inappropriate prescriptions (n = 6). Pooled data showed a mean difference of -0.47 prescriptions per 1000 resident-days in favour of ASPs (95% CI -0.87 to -0.07, I <superscript>2</superscript>  = 71%). Five studies analysed the clinical effect of ASPs on the number of hospital admissions and/or resident mortality. The meta-analysis showed a mean difference of 0.17 hospital admissions per 1000 resident-days (95% CI -0.07 to 0.41, I <superscript>2</superscript>  = 17%) and a mean difference of -0.02 deaths per 1000 resident-days (95% CI -0.14 to 0.09, I <superscript>2</superscript>  = 0%). Only two studies included infections as a study outcome.<br />Conclusions: ASPs appear to improve antimicrobial use in this setting without increasing hospital admissions or deaths, indicating that these programmes do not lead to under-treatment of infections. Nonetheless, further higher-quality clinical trials are required to understand the effects of ASPs in LTCFs.<br />Prospero Registration Number: CRD42021225127.<br /> (Copyright © 2021 European Society of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
1469-0691
Volume :
27
Issue :
10
Database :
MEDLINE
Journal :
Clinical microbiology and infection : the official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
34118423
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cmi.2021.06.003