Back to Search Start Over

Transitions of Care After Critical Illness-Challenges to Recovery and Adaptive Problem Solving.

Authors :
Haines KJ
Hibbert E
Leggett N
Boehm LM
Hall T
Bakhru RN
Bastin AJ
Butcher BW
Eaton TL
Harris W
Hope AA
Jackson J
Johnson A
Kloos JA
Korzick KA
Mactavish P
Meyer J
Montgomery-Yates A
Quasim T
Slack A
Wade D
Still M
Netzer G
Hopkins RO
Iwashyna TJ
Mikkelsen ME
McPeake J
Sevin CM
Source :
Critical care medicine [Crit Care Med] 2021 Nov 01; Vol. 49 (11), pp. 1923-1931.
Publication Year :
2021

Abstract

Objectives: Investigate the challenges experienced by survivors of critical illness and their caregivers across the transitions of care from intensive care to community, and the potential problem-solving strategies used to navigate these challenges.<br />Design: Qualitative design-data generation via interviews and data analysis via the framework analysis method.<br />Setting: Patients and caregivers from three continents, identified through the Society of Critical Care Medicine's THRIVE international collaborative sites (follow-up clinics and peer support groups).<br />Subjects: Patients and caregivers following critical illness.<br />Interventions: Nil.<br />Measurements and Main Results: From 86 interviews (66 patients, 20 caregivers), we identified the following major themes: 1) Challenges for patients-interacting with the health system and gaps in care; managing others' expectations of illness and recovery. 2) Challenges for caregivers-health system shortfalls and inadequate communication; lack of support for caregivers. 3) Patient and caregiver-driven problem solving across the transitions of care-personal attributes, resources, and initiative; receiving support and helping others; and acceptance.<br />Conclusions: Survivors and caregivers experienced a range of challenges across the transitions of care. There were distinct and contrasting themes related to the caregiver experience. Survivors and caregivers used comparable problem-solving strategies to navigate the challenges encountered across the transitions of care.<br />Competing Interests: Drs. Haines’, Boehm’s, Quasim’s, McPeake’s, and Sevin’s institutions received funding from the Society of Critical Care Medicine. Drs. Haines, Boehm, Quasim, McPeake, and Sevin received funding from the Society of Critical Care Medicine to undertake this work. Dr. Boehm is funded by National Institutes of Health (NIH)/National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI) (K12 HL137943) as is Dr. Iwashyna (K12 HL138039). Drs. Boehm’s and Hope’s institutions received funding from the NHLBI. Dr. Boehm’s institution received funding from the American Association of Critical Care Nurses (AACN). Drs. Boehm and Hope received support for article research from the NIH and the AACN Impact Grant. Dr. Hope’s institution received funding from the NIH; he received funding from the AACN. Dr. Netzer received funding from UptoDate. Dr. Hopkins’ institution received funding from the Intermountain Research and Medical Foundation. Dr. Iwashyna received support for article research from the government. Dr. McPeake is funded by a THIS.Institute Post-Doctoral Fellowship (PD-2019-02-16). Dr. McPeake’s institution received funding from the THIS Institute, University of Cambridge. The remaining authors have disclosed that they do not have any potential conflicts of interest.<br /> (Copyright © 2021 by the Society of Critical Care Medicine and Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All Rights Reserved.)

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
1530-0293
Volume :
49
Issue :
11
Database :
MEDLINE
Journal :
Critical care medicine
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
34091486
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1097/CCM.0000000000005095