Back to Search Start Over

Macroscopic on-site evaluation (MOSE) of specimens from solid lesions acquired during EUS-FNB: multicenter study and comparison between needle gauges.

Authors :
Mangiavillano B
Frazzoni L
Togliani T
Fabbri C
Tarantino I
De Luca L
Staiano T
Binda C
Signoretti M
Eusebi LH
Auriemma F
Lamonaca L
Paduano D
Di Leo M
Carrara S
Fuccio L
Repici A
Source :
Endoscopy international open [Endosc Int Open] 2021 Jun; Vol. 9 (6), pp. E901-E906. Date of Electronic Publication: 2021 May 27.
Publication Year :
2021

Abstract

Background and study aims  The standard method for obtaining samples during endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS) is fine-needle aspiration (FNA), the accuracy of which can be affected by the presence of a cytopathologist in endoscopy room (rapid on-site evaluation [ROSE]). With the introduction of fine-needle biopsy (FNB), macroscopic on-site evaluation (MOSE) of a acquired specimen has been proposed. Only a few studies have evaluated the role of MOSE and in all except one, a 19G needle was used. Our primary aim was to evaluate the diagnostic yield and accuracy of MOSE with different needle sizes and the secondary aim was to identify factors influencing the yield of MOSE. Patients and methods  Data from patients who underwent EUS-FNB for solid lesions, with MOSE evaluation of the specimen, were collected in six endoscopic referral centers. Results  A total of 378 patients (145 F and 233 M) were enrolled. Needles sizes used during the procedures were 20G (42 %), 22G (45 %), and 25G (13 %). The median number of needle passes was two (IQR 2-3). The overall diagnostic yield of MOSE was of 90 % (confidence interval [CI] 86 %-92 %). On multivariable logistic regression analysis, variables independently associated with the diagnostic yield of MOSE were a larger needle diameter (20G vs. 25G, OR 11.64, 95 %CI 3.5-38.71; 22G vs. 25G, OR 6.20, 95 %CI 2.41-15.90) and three of more needle passes (OR 3.39, 95 %CI 1.38-8.31). Conclusions  MOSE showed high diagnostic yield and accuracy. Its yield was further increased if performed with a large size FNB needles and more than two passes.<br />Competing Interests: Competing interests The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.<br /> (The Author(s). This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonDerivative-NonCommercial License, permitting copying and reproduction so long as the original work is given appropriate credit. Contents may not be used for commercial purposes, or adapted, remixed, transformed or built upon. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).)

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
2364-3722
Volume :
9
Issue :
6
Database :
MEDLINE
Journal :
Endoscopy international open
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
34079874
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1055/a-1395-7129