Back to Search
Start Over
Dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI perfusion quantification in hepatocellular carcinoma: comparison of gadoxetate disodium and gadobenate dimeglumine.
- Source :
-
European radiology [Eur Radiol] 2021 Dec; Vol. 31 (12), pp. 9306-9315. Date of Electronic Publication: 2021 May 27. - Publication Year :
- 2021
-
Abstract
- Objectives: (1) To assess the quality of the arterial input function (AIF) during dynamic contrast-enhanced (DCE) MRI of the liver and (2) to quantify perfusion parameters of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and liver parenchyma during the first 3 min post-contrast injection with DCE-MRI using gadoxetate disodium compared to gadobenate dimeglumine (Gd-BOPTA) in different patient populations.<br />Methods: In this prospective study, we evaluated 66 patients with 83 HCCs who underwent DCE-MRI, using gadoxetate disodium (group 1, n = 28) or Gd-BOPTA (group 2, n = 38). AIF qualitative and quantitative features were assessed. Perfusion parameters (based on the initial 3 min post-contrast) were extracted in tumours and liver parenchyma, including model-free parameters (time-to-peak enhancement (TTP), time-to-washout) and modelled parameters (arterial flow (F <subscript>a</subscript> ), portal venous flow (F <subscript>p</subscript> ), total flow (F <subscript>t</subscript> ), arterial fraction, mean transit time (MTT), distribution volume (DV)). In addition, lesion-to-liver contrast ratios (LLCRs) were measured. Fisher's exact tests and Mann-Whitney U tests were used to compare the two groups.<br />Results: AIF quality, modelled and model-free perfusion parameters in HCC were similar between the 2 groups (p = 0.054-0.932). Liver parenchymal flow was lower and liver enhancement occurred later in group 1 vs group 2 (F <subscript>p</subscript> , p = 0.002; F <subscript>t</subscript> , p = 0.001; TTP, MTT, all p < 0.001), while there were no significant differences in tumour LLCR (max. positive LLCR, p = 0.230; max. negative LLCR, p = 0.317).<br />Conclusion: Gadoxetate disodium provides comparable AIF quality and HCC perfusion parameters compared to Gd-BOPTA during dynamic phases. Despite delayed and decreased liver enhancement with gadoxetate disodium, LLCRs were equivalent between contrast agents, indicating similar tumour conspicuity.<br />Key Points: • Arterial input function quality, modelled, and model-free dynamic parameters measured in hepatocellular carcinoma are similar in patients receiving gadoxetate disodium or gadobenate dimeglumine during the first 3 min post injection. • Gadoxetate disodium and gadobenate dimeglumine show similar lesion-to-liver contrast ratios during dynamic phases in patients with HCC. • There is lower portal and lower total hepatic flow and longer hepatic mean transit time and time-to-peak with gadoxetate disodium compared to gadobenate dimeglumine.<br /> (© 2021. European Society of Radiology.)
Details
- Language :
- English
- ISSN :
- 1432-1084
- Volume :
- 31
- Issue :
- 12
- Database :
- MEDLINE
- Journal :
- European radiology
- Publication Type :
- Academic Journal
- Accession number :
- 34043055
- Full Text :
- https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-021-08068-5