Back to Search Start Over

Immunochemical and urodynamic outcomes after polypropylene mesh explant from the pelvic wall of rats.

Authors :
Lo TS
Lin YH
Huang TX
Chu HC
Chen YP
Source :
International urogynecology journal [Int Urogynecol J] 2022 Jul; Vol. 33 (7), pp. 1839-1848. Date of Electronic Publication: 2021 May 26.
Publication Year :
2022

Abstract

Introduction and Hypothesis: To analyze the immunochemical and urodynamic outcomes after partial versus complete excision of transvaginal polypropylene mesh (PPM) from pelvic walls of rats.<br />Methods: Forty-eight female Sprague-Dawley (SD) rats were randomly distributed into seven groups: control, mesh total removal 60 days (M-T 60D), mesh total removal 180 days (M-T 180D), mesh partial removal 60 days (M-H 60D), mesh partial removal 180 days (M-H 180D), sham 60 days (Sham 60D), and sham 180 days (Sham 180D). In the mesh groups, PPM was inserted and partially (0.3 × 0.3 cm) or completely removed 30 days later. In the Sham group, the space between the vagina and bladder was dissected without placing or removing the synthetic mesh at day 1 and day 30 later. Urodynamic studies, immunochemical analysis, and Western blot were done at days 60 and 180.<br />Results: The M-T 60D voiding pressure was significantly decreased compared to the Sham 60D and M-H 60D. The voiding interval of M-T 60D was significantly shorter than that of M-H 60D. In the M-T 60D and M-T 180D groups, the leak point pressure was significantly less than in their corresponding sham groups. IL-1 and TNF-α were significantly more intense in M-T 60D compared to M-H 60D and Sham 60D. NGF was significantly greater in M-T 60D compared to Sham 60D. There were no significant differences in MMP-2 and CD-31s throughout the group.<br />Conclusion: Total mesh excision incites a host inflammatory response and transitory lower urinary tract dysfunction. Despite the good outcomes after total excision, the invasiveness and surgical risk associated with repeated procedures should not be underestimateded.<br /> (© 2021. The International Urogynecological Association.)

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
1433-3023
Volume :
33
Issue :
7
Database :
MEDLINE
Journal :
International urogynecology journal
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
34037814
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-021-04842-7