Back to Search Start Over

Prognostic value of noninvasive combined anatomic/functional assessment by cardiac CT in patients with suspected coronary artery disease - Comparison with invasive coronary angiography and nuclear myocardial perfusion imaging for the five-year-follow up of the CORE320 multicenter study.

Authors :
Dewey M
Rochitte CE
Ostovaneh MR
Chen MY
George RT
Niinuma H
Kitagawa K
Laham R
Kofoed K
Nomura C
Sakuma H
Yoshioka K
Mehra VC
Jinzaki M
Kuribayashi S
Laule M
Paul N
Scholte AJ
Cerci R
Hoe J
Tan SY
Rybicki FJ
Matheson MB
Vavere AL
Arai AE
Miller JM
Cox C
Brinker J
Clouse ME
Di Carli M
Lima JAC
Arbab-Zadeh A
Source :
Journal of cardiovascular computed tomography [J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr] 2021 Nov-Dec; Vol. 15 (6), pp. 485-491. Date of Electronic Publication: 2021 May 12.
Publication Year :
2021

Abstract

Background: Few data exist on long-term outcome in patients undergoing combined coronary CT angiography (CTA) and myocardial CT perfusion imaging (CTP) as well as invasive coronary angiography (ICA) and single photon emission tomography (SPECT).<br />Methods: At 16 centers, 381 patients were followed for major adverse cardiac events (MACE) for the CORE320 study. All patients underwent coronary CTA, CTP, and SPECT before ICA within 60 days. Prognostic performance according binary results (normal/abnormal) was assessed by 5-year major cardiovascular events (MACE) free survival and area under the receiver-operating-characteristic curve (AUC).<br />Results: Follow up beyond 2-years was available in 323 patients. MACE-free survival rate was greater among patients with normal combined CTA-CTP findings compared to ICA-SPECT: 85 vs. 80% (95% confidence interval [CI] for difference 0.1, 11.3) though event-free survival time was similar (4.54 vs. 4.37 years, 95% CI for difference: -0.03, 0.36). Abnormal results by combined CTA-CTP was associated with 3.83 years event-free survival vs. 3.66 years after abnormal combined ICA-SPECT (95% CI for difference: -0.05, 0.39). Predicting MACE by AUC also was similar: 65 vs. 65 (difference 0.1; 95% CI -4.6, 4.9). When MACE was restricted to cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction, or stroke, AUC for CTA-CTP was 71 vs. 60 by ICA-SPECT (difference 11.2; 95% CI -1.0, 19.7).<br />Conclusions: Combined CTA-CTP evaluation yields at least equal 5-year prognostic information as combined ICA-SPECT assessment in patients presenting with suspected coronary artery disease. Noninvasive cardiac CT assessment may eliminate the need for diagnostic cardiac catheterization in many patients.<br />Clinical Trial Registration: NCT00934037.<br /> (Copyright © 2021 Society of Cardiovascular Computed Tomography. All rights reserved.)

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
1876-861X
Volume :
15
Issue :
6
Database :
MEDLINE
Journal :
Journal of cardiovascular computed tomography
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
34024757
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcct.2021.04.005