Back to Search Start Over

Cost-Effectiveness of Anti-Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Therapy Versus Bevacizumab in KRAS Wild-Type (WT), Pan-RAS WT, and Pan-RAS WT Left-Sided Metastatic Colorectal Cancer.

Authors :
Lee SF
Choi HCW
Chan SK
Lam KO
Lee VHF
Wong IOL
Chiang CL
Source :
Frontiers in oncology [Front Oncol] 2021 May 03; Vol. 11, pp. 651299. Date of Electronic Publication: 2021 May 03 (Print Publication: 2021).
Publication Year :
2021

Abstract

Objectives: We aimed to compare the economic value of chemotherapy plus anti-epidermal growth factor receptor (anti-EGFR) monoclonal antibody (mAb) against chemotherapy with bevacizumab (Bev, an anti-vascular endothelial growth factor mAb) as first-line treatment in KRAS wild-type (WT), pan-RAS WT and pan-RAS WT left-sided metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) patients from the Hong Kong societal perspective.<br />Materials and Methods: We developed Markov models and 10-year horizon to estimate costs, quality-adjusted life years (QALYs), and incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) of chemotherapy plus anti-EGFR therapy against chemotherapy plus Bev in KRAS WT, pan-RAS WT, and pan-RAS WT left-sided mCRC. We considered two times of the local gross domestic product per capita (GDPpc) as the willingness-to-pay (WTP) threshold (2× GDPpc; US$97,832).<br />Results: Adding anti-EGFR mAb to chemotherapy provides additional 0.24 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.19-0.29), 0.32 (95% CI 0.27-0.37), and 0.57 (95% CI 0.49-0.63) QALY compared to adding Bev in KRAS WT, pan-RAS WT, and left-sided pan-RAS WT mCRC populations respectively. The corresponding ICER is US$106,847 (95% CI 87,806-134,523), US$88,565 (95% CI 75,678-105,871), US$76,537 (95% CI 67,794-87,917) per QALY gained, respectively.<br />Conclusions: Anti-EGFR therapy is more cost-effective than Bev as a first-line targeted therapy in left-sided pan-RAS WT and pan-RAS WT, with ICER <US$100,000/QALY, compared to KRAS WT mCRC population.<br />Competing Interests: CC has consulting or advisory role for AstraZeneca and Eiasi; and research funding from AstraZeneca and Merck Kgga unrelated to this study. The remaining authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.<br /> (Copyright © 2021 Lee, Choi, Chan, Lam, Lee, Wong and Chiang.)

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
2234-943X
Volume :
11
Database :
MEDLINE
Journal :
Frontiers in oncology
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
34012917
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2021.651299