The impact of sub specialization within functional neurosurgery on patient outcomes in a comprehensive epilepsy center.

Background: One in three patients with epilepsy are medication-refractory and may benefit from investigations and operative treatment at a comprehensive epilepsy center. However, while these centers have capabilities for advanced seizure monitoring and surgical intervention, they are not required to have a functional neurosurgeon who is primarily focused in epilepsy surgery. Therefore, the objective of this study is to determine the impact of having a sub-specialized, epilepsy-focused functional neurosurgeon on patient outcomes.
Methods: We conducted a retrospective chart review for all patients who underwent surgical intervention for medically refractory epilepsy at a Level 4 comprehensive Epilepsy Center from 2008 through 2019. Data was divided into two groups: group 1 comprised patients who had surgery before the hiring of a dedicated epilepsy-focused functional neurosurgeon in 2016, and group 2 was afterwards. We compared surgical procedures, significant complications, and seizure outcomes.
Results: A total of 101 patients underwent 105 operations (52 in group 1 and 53 in group 2), not including intracranial EEG insertion. Compared to group 1, group 2 had more surgeries performed per year (15.1 vs. 6.5), and a significantly lower Engel score at last follow-up (1.78 vs. 2.57; p < 0.001). There was no difference in percentage of cases undergoing iEEG, and no difference in complication rates.
Conclusions: In this series, the hiring of a sub-specialized functional neurosurgeon dedicated to epilepsy surgery in a comprehensive epilepsy center was associated with an increase in surgical volume and improved seizure outcomes.
(Crown Copyright © 2021. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)