Back to Search Start Over

Automated control of oxygen titration in preterm infants on non-invasive respiratory support.

Authors :
Dargaville PA
Marshall AP
Ladlow OJ
Bannink C
Jayakar R
Eastwood-Sutherland C
Lim K
Ali SKM
Gale TJ
Source :
Archives of disease in childhood. Fetal and neonatal edition [Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed] 2022 Jan; Vol. 107 (1), pp. 39-44. Date of Electronic Publication: 2021 May 07.
Publication Year :
2022

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate the performance of a rapidly responsive adaptive algorithm (VDL1.1) for automated oxygen control in preterm infants with respiratory insufficiency.<br />Design: Interventional cross-over study of a 24-hour period of automated oxygen control compared with aggregated data from two flanking periods of manual control (12 hours each).<br />Setting: Neonatal intensive care unit.<br />Participants: Preterm infants receiving non-invasive respiratory support and supplemental oxygen; median birth gestation 27 weeks (IQR 26-28) and postnatal age 17 (12-23) days.<br />Intervention: Automated oxygen titration with the VDL1.1 algorithm, with the incoming SpO <subscript>2</subscript> signal derived from a standard oximetry probe, and the computed inspired oxygen concentration (FiO <subscript>2</subscript> ) adjustments actuated by a motorised blender. The desired SpO <subscript>2</subscript> range was 90%-94%, with bedside clinicians able to make corrective manual FiO <subscript>2</subscript> adjustments at all times.<br />Main Outcome Measures: Target range (TR) time (SpO <subscript>2</subscript> 90%-94% or 90%-100% if in air), periods of SpO <subscript>2</subscript> deviation, number of manual FiO <subscript>2</subscript> adjustments and oxygen requirement were compared between automated and manual control periods.<br />Results: In 60 cross-over studies in 35 infants, automated oxygen titration resulted in greater TR time (manual 58 (51-64)% vs automated 81 (72-85)%, p<0.001), less time at both extremes of oxygenation and considerably fewer prolonged hypoxaemic and hyperoxaemic episodes. The algorithm functioned effectively in every infant. Manual FiO <subscript>2</subscript> adjustments were infrequent during automated control (0.11 adjustments/hour), and oxygen requirements were similar (manual 28 (25-32)% and automated 26 (24-32)%, p=0.13).<br />Conclusion: The VDL1.1 algorithm was safe and effective in SpO <subscript>2</subscript> targeting in preterm infants on non-invasive respiratory support.<br />Trial Registration Number: ACTRN12616000300471.<br />Competing Interests: Competing interests: The University of Tasmania and Tasmanian Health Service have jointly lodged a patent application concerning automated control of inspired oxygen concentration in the newborn infant, and have entered into a licensing agreement with SLE Limited allowing use of the VDL1.1 algorithm (as OxyGenie) in SLE respiratory support devices.<br /> (© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2022. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.)

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
1468-2052
Volume :
107
Issue :
1
Database :
MEDLINE
Journal :
Archives of disease in childhood. Fetal and neonatal edition
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
33963005
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1136/archdischild-2020-321538