Back to Search
Start Over
68 Ga-PSMA-11 PET, 18 F-PSMA-1007 PET, and MRI for Gross Tumor Volume Delineation in Primary Prostate Cancer: Intermodality and Intertracer Variability.
- Source :
-
Practical radiation oncology [Pract Radiat Oncol] 2021 May-Jun; Vol. 11 (3), pp. 202-211. - Publication Year :
- 2021
-
Abstract
- Purpose: To assess the intermodality and intertracer variability of gallium-68 ( <superscript>68</superscript> Ga)- or fluorine-18 ( <superscript>18</superscript> F)-labeled prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) positron emission tomography (PET) and biparametric magnetic resonance imaging (bpMRI)-based gross tumor volume (GTV) delineation for focal boosting in primary prostate cancer.<br />Methods: Nineteen prospectively enrolled patients with prostate cancer underwent a PSMA PET/MRI scan, divided into a 1:1 ratio between <superscript>68</superscript> Ga-PSMA-11 and <superscript>18</superscript> F-PSMA-1007, before radical prostatectomy (IWT140193). Four delineation teams performed manual contouring of the GTV based on bpMRI and PSMA PET imaging, separately. Index lesion coverage (overlap%) and interobserver variability were assessed. Furthermore, the distribution of the voxelwise normalized standardized uptake values (SUV%) was determined for the majority-voted (>50%) GTV (GTV <superscript>majority</superscript> ) and whole prostate gland to investigate intertracer variability. The median patientwise SUV% contrast ratio (SUV%-CR, calculated as median GTV <superscript>majority</superscript> SUV% / median prostate gland without GTV <superscript>majority</superscript> SUV%) was calculated according to the tracer used.<br />Results: A significant difference in overlap% favoring PSMA PET compared with bpMRI was found in the <superscript>18</superscript> F subgroup (median, 63.0% vs 53.1%; P = .004) but was not present in the <superscript>68</superscript> Ga subgroup (32.5% vs 50.6%; P = .100). Regarding interobserver variability, measured Sørensen-Dice coefficients (0.58 vs 0.72) and calculated mean distances to agreement (2.44 mm vs 1.22 mm) were statistically significantly lower and higher, respectively, for the <superscript>18</superscript> F cohort compared with the <superscript>68</superscript> Ga cohort. For the bpMRI-based delineations, the median Sørensen-Dice coefficient and mean distance to agreement were 0.63 and 1.76 mm, respectively. Median patientwise SUV%-CRs of 1.8 (interquartile range [IQR], 1.6-2.7) for <superscript>18</superscript> F-PSMA and 3.3 (IQR, 2.7-5.9) for <superscript>68</superscript> Ga-PSMA PET images were found.<br />Conclusions: Both MRI and PSMA PET provided consistent intraprostatic GTV lesion detection. However, the PSMA tracer seems to have a major influence on the contour characteristics, owing to an apparent difference in SUV% distribution in the prostate gland.<br /> (Copyright © 2020 American Society for Radiation Oncology. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)
Details
- Language :
- English
- ISSN :
- 1879-8519
- Volume :
- 11
- Issue :
- 3
- Database :
- MEDLINE
- Journal :
- Practical radiation oncology
- Publication Type :
- Academic Journal
- Accession number :
- 33941347
- Full Text :
- https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prro.2020.11.006