Back to Search Start Over

Validation of the PHQ-9 in adults with dissociative seizures.

Authors :
Baldellou Lopez M
Goldstein LH
Robinson EJ
Vitoratou S
Chalder T
Carson A
Stone J
Reuber M
Source :
Journal of psychosomatic research [J Psychosom Res] 2021 Jul; Vol. 146, pp. 110487. Date of Electronic Publication: 2021 Apr 08.
Publication Year :
2021

Abstract

Background: The PHQ-9 is a self-administered depression screening instrument. Little is known about its utility and accuracy in detecting depression in adults with dissociative seizures (DS).<br />Objectives: Using the Mini - International Neuropsychiatric Interview as a reference, we evaluated the diagnostic accuracy of the PHQ-9 in adults with DS, and examined its convergent and discriminant validity and uniformity.<br />Methods: Our sample comprised 368 people with DS who completed the pre-randomisation assessment of the CODES trial. The uniformity of the PHQ-9 was determined using factor analysis for categorical data. Optimal cut-offs were determined using the area under the curve (AUC), Youden Index, and diagnostic odds ratio (DOR). Convergent and discriminant validity were assessed against pre-randomisation measures.<br />Results: Internal consistency of the PHQ-9 was high (α = 0.87). While the diagnostic odds ratio suggested that a cut-off of ≥10 had the best predictive performance (DOR = 14.7), specificity at this cut off was only 0.49. AUC (0.74) and Youden Index (0.48) suggested a ≥ 13 cut-off would yield an optimal sensitivity (0.81) and specificity (0.67) balance. However, a cut-off score of ≥20 would be required to match specificity resulting from a cut-off of ≥13 in other medical conditions. We found good convergent and discriminant validity and one main factor for the PHQ-9.<br />Conclusions: In terms of internal consistency and structure, our findings were consistent with previous validation studies but indicated that a higher cut-off would be required to identify DS patients with depression with similar specificity achieved with PHQ-9 screening in different clinical and non-clinical populations.<br /> (Copyright © 2021 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
1879-1360
Volume :
146
Database :
MEDLINE
Journal :
Journal of psychosomatic research
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
33932719
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpsychores.2021.110487