Back to Search Start Over

A nationwide survey on the impact of COVID-19 pandemic on minimal invasive surgery in urology practice.

Authors :
Danacioglu YO
Soytas M
Polat S
Ozdemir O
Arikan O
Yenice MG
Atis RG
Tasci AI
Source :
International journal of clinical practice [Int J Clin Pract] 2021 Aug; Vol. 75 (8), pp. e14309. Date of Electronic Publication: 2021 May 20.
Publication Year :
2021

Abstract

Objective: The beta-coronavirus (COVID-19) pandemic has changed the clinical approach of 93% of urologists worldwide, and this situation has affected the use of laparoscopic and robot-assisted laparoscopic methods, which are known as minimally invasive surgery (MIS). This study aimed to determine the effects of the COVID-19 pandemic on MIS in urology practice at national level.<br />Design, Setting and Participants: A total of 234 urologists in Turkey participated in an online survey between August 22 and September 23, 2020.<br />Outcome Measurements and Statistical Analysis: Descriptive statistical analyses were conducted to determine the participants' demographic characteristics and responses to multiple-choice questions.<br />Results: While 54% of urologists stated that they were concerned about the possibility that the patients planned to undergo MIS were carrying COVID-19 or false-negative for the virus, 51% considered that open surgery was safer than MIS in this regard. The pandemic led to a difference in the preferences of 40% of the urologists in relation to open or MIS methods, and during the pandemic, 39% of the urologists always directed their patients to open surgery. It was determined that during the pandemic, there was a statistical decrease in the intensity and weekly application of MIS methods among all surgical procedures compared to the pre-pandemic (P < .001 and P < .001, respectively). MIS was preferred for oncological operations by 97.3% of the urologists during the pandemic, with the most performed operation being radical nephrectomy (90.7%). Among oncological operations, radical prostatectomy was most frequently postponed. To prevent virus transmission during MIS, 44% of the urologists reported that they always used an additional evacuation system and 52% took additional precautions. There were a total of 27 healthcare workers who took part in MIS and tested positive for COVID-19 after the operation.<br />Conclusions: Although the number of operations has decreased during the ongoing pandemic, MIS is a method that can be preferred due to its limited contamination and mortality in urology practice provided that safety measures are taken and guideline recommendations are followed.<br /> (© 2021 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.)

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
1742-1241
Volume :
75
Issue :
8
Database :
MEDLINE
Journal :
International journal of clinical practice
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
33932070
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1111/ijcp.14309