Back to Search
Start Over
A nationwide survey on the impact of COVID-19 pandemic on minimal invasive surgery in urology practice.
- Source :
-
International journal of clinical practice [Int J Clin Pract] 2021 Aug; Vol. 75 (8), pp. e14309. Date of Electronic Publication: 2021 May 20. - Publication Year :
- 2021
-
Abstract
- Objective: The beta-coronavirus (COVID-19) pandemic has changed the clinical approach of 93% of urologists worldwide, and this situation has affected the use of laparoscopic and robot-assisted laparoscopic methods, which are known as minimally invasive surgery (MIS). This study aimed to determine the effects of the COVID-19 pandemic on MIS in urology practice at national level.<br />Design, Setting and Participants: A total of 234 urologists in Turkey participated in an online survey between August 22 and September 23, 2020.<br />Outcome Measurements and Statistical Analysis: Descriptive statistical analyses were conducted to determine the participants' demographic characteristics and responses to multiple-choice questions.<br />Results: While 54% of urologists stated that they were concerned about the possibility that the patients planned to undergo MIS were carrying COVID-19 or false-negative for the virus, 51% considered that open surgery was safer than MIS in this regard. The pandemic led to a difference in the preferences of 40% of the urologists in relation to open or MIS methods, and during the pandemic, 39% of the urologists always directed their patients to open surgery. It was determined that during the pandemic, there was a statistical decrease in the intensity and weekly application of MIS methods among all surgical procedures compared to the pre-pandemic (P < .001 and P < .001, respectively). MIS was preferred for oncological operations by 97.3% of the urologists during the pandemic, with the most performed operation being radical nephrectomy (90.7%). Among oncological operations, radical prostatectomy was most frequently postponed. To prevent virus transmission during MIS, 44% of the urologists reported that they always used an additional evacuation system and 52% took additional precautions. There were a total of 27 healthcare workers who took part in MIS and tested positive for COVID-19 after the operation.<br />Conclusions: Although the number of operations has decreased during the ongoing pandemic, MIS is a method that can be preferred due to its limited contamination and mortality in urology practice provided that safety measures are taken and guideline recommendations are followed.<br /> (© 2021 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.)
Details
- Language :
- English
- ISSN :
- 1742-1241
- Volume :
- 75
- Issue :
- 8
- Database :
- MEDLINE
- Journal :
- International journal of clinical practice
- Publication Type :
- Academic Journal
- Accession number :
- 33932070
- Full Text :
- https://doi.org/10.1111/ijcp.14309