Back to Search Start Over

Association Between Hospital Cardiovascular Procedural Volumes and Transcatheter Mitral Valve Repair Outcomes.

Authors :
Kolte D
Butala NM
Kennedy KF
Wasfy JH
Jena AB
Sakhuja R
Langer N
Melnitchouk S
Sundt TM 3rd
Passeri JJ
Palacios IF
Inglessis I
Elmariah S
Source :
Cardiovascular revascularization medicine : including molecular interventions [Cardiovasc Revasc Med] 2022 Mar; Vol. 36, pp. 27-33. Date of Electronic Publication: 2021 Apr 21.
Publication Year :
2022

Abstract

Background: Cardiovascular procedural volumes can serve as metrics of hospital infrastructure and quality, and are the basis for thresholds for initiating transcatheter mitral valve repair (TMVr) programs. Whether hospital volumes of TMVr, surgical mitral valve replacement or repair (SMVRr), and percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) are indicators of TMVr quality of care is not known.<br />Methods: We used the 2017 Nationwide Readmissions Database to identify hospitals that performed at least 5 TMVr procedures. Hospitals were divided into quartiles of TMVr volume. Associations of hospital TMVr, SMVRr, and PCI volumes, as well as SMVRr and PCI outcomes with TMVr outcomes were examined. Outcomes studied were risk-standardized in-hospital mortality rate (RSMR) and 30-day readmission rate (RSRR).<br />Results: The study included 3404 TMVr procedures performed across 150 hospitals in the US. The median hospital TMVr volume was 17 (IQR 10, 28). The mean hospital-level RSMR and RSRR for TMVr were 3.0% (95% CI 2.5%, 3.4%) and 14.8% (95% CI 14.5%, 15.0%), respectively. There was no significant association between hospital TMVr volume (as quartiles or as a continuous variable) and TMVr RSMR or RSRR (P > 0.05). Similarly, there was weak or no correlation between hospital SMVRr and PCI volumes and outcomes with TMVr RSMR or RSRR (Pearson correlation coefficients, r = -0.199 to 0.269).<br />Conclusion: In this study, we found no relationship between hospital TMVr, SMVRr, and PCI volume and TMVr outcomes. Further studies are needed to determine more appropriate structure and process measures to assess the performance of established and new TMVr centers.<br />Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest Dr. Butala reports consulting fees and ownership interest from HiLabs outside of the submitted work. Dr. Wasfy serves on a NHLBI working group on valvular heart disease and is supported by a grant from the American Heart Association (18 CDA 34110215). Dr. Sakhuja has been a consultant for Medtronic and Edwards Lifesciences. Dr. Passeri has received institutional research support from Edwards Lifesciences; has been a speaker at an educational symposium sponsored by Medtronic; and has received consulting fees from Medtronic. Dr. Palacios is a consultant for Abiomed. Dr. Inglessis has received institutional research support from Medtronic, St. Jude Medical, and W.L. Gore and Associates; and is a proctor for Medtronic and Edwards Lifesciences. Dr. Elmariah is supported by research grants from American Heart Association (19TPA34910170), National Institutes of Health (R01 HL151838), and has received research grants from Edwards Lifesciences and Svelte Medical; and has received consulting fees from Medtronic and AstraZeneca. All other authors have reported that they have no relationships relevant to the contents of this paper to disclose.<br /> (Copyright © 2021. Published by Elsevier Inc.)

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
1878-0938
Volume :
36
Database :
MEDLINE
Journal :
Cardiovascular revascularization medicine : including molecular interventions
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
33903039
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carrev.2021.04.017