Back to Search Start Over

Association Between Ejaculatory Dysfunction and Post-Void Dribbling After Urethroplasty.

Authors :
Theisen KM
Soubra A
Grove S
Vanni AJ
Erickson BA
Breyer BN
Myers JB
Voelzke B
Broghammer JA
Rourke KF
Alsikafi NF
Buckley JC
Peterson AC
Elliott SP
Source :
Urology [Urology] 2021 Jul; Vol. 153, pp. 320-326. Date of Electronic Publication: 2021 Apr 24.
Publication Year :
2021

Abstract

Objective: To determine whether ejaculatory dysfunction (EjD) and post-void dribbling (PVD) after urethroplasty are associated, providing evidence for a common etiology.<br />Methods: We reviewed a prospectively maintained database for first-time, anterior urethroplasties. One item from the Male Sexual Health Questionnaire (MSHQ) assessed EjD: "How would you rate the strength or force of your ejaculation". One item from the Urethral Stricture Surgery Patient-Reported Outcome Measure (USS-PROM) assessed PVD: "How often have you had slight wetting of your pants after you had finished urinating?". The frequency of symptoms was compared after penile vs. bulbar repairs, and anastomotic versus augmentation bulbar repairs. Associations were assessed with chi-square.<br />Results: A total of 728 men were included. Overall, postoperative EjD and PVD were common; 67% and 66%, respectively. There was a significant association between EjD and PVD for the whole cohort (p<0.0001); this association remained significant after penile repairs (p=0.01), bulbar repairs (p<0.0007), and bulbar anastomotic repairs (p=0.002), but not after bulbar augmentation repairs (p=0.052). EjD and PVD occurred at similar rates after penile and bulbar urethroplasty. The rate of EjD was similar after bulbar augmentation and bulbar anastomotic urethroplasties, but PVD was more common after bulbar augmentation (70% vs. 52%) (p = 0.0001).<br />Conclusion: EjD and PVD after anterior urethroplasty are significantly associated with one another, supporting the theory of a common etiology. High rates after penile repairs argue against a bulbospongiosus muscle damage etiology, and high rates after anastomotic repairs argue against graft sacculation. More work is needed to better understand and prevent symptoms.<br /> (Copyright © 2021 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
1527-9995
Volume :
153
Database :
MEDLINE
Journal :
Urology
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
33901530
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.urology.2021.04.016