Back to Search Start Over

Assessment of low volume sampling technologies: utility in nonclinical and clinical studies.

Authors :
Williams KJ
Lutman J
McCaughey C
Fischer SK
Source :
Bioanalysis [Bioanalysis] 2021 May; Vol. 13 (9), pp. 679-691. Date of Electronic Publication: 2021 Apr 26.
Publication Year :
2021

Abstract

Background: Low volume sampling technologies have come a long way; however, their uptake has been slow due to logistical and perceived implementation challenges. Additional studies are needed to overcome these barriers. Materials & methods/results: Here we present two studies where different sampling technologies were evaluated to determine the feasibility of their implementation. First, we evaluated pharmacokinetic profiles for anti-gD in rats using three tail bleed sampling methods, glass capillary tubes, Shimadzu MSW2 <superscript>®</superscript>  and the Neoteryx Mitra <superscript>®</superscript> microsampler. Second, we evaluated two low volume-sampling methods to measure drug levels from patients treated with anti-A therapeutic. This evaluation used whole blood finger pricks for Neoteryx Mitra and plasma from capillary blood using TASSO OnDemand technology to compare results to established venipuncture collection method. Conclusion: These studies evaluate the feasibility and considerations for implementation of different low volume sampling technologies.

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
1757-6199
Volume :
13
Issue :
9
Database :
MEDLINE
Journal :
Bioanalysis
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
33900106
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.4155/bio-2021-0027