Back to Search Start Over

Treatment of Breast Cancer-Related Lymphedema Using Negative Pressure Massage: A Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial.

Authors :
Lampinen R
Lee JQ
Leano J
Miaskowski C
Mastick J
Brinker L
Topp K
Smoot B
Source :
Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation [Arch Phys Med Rehabil] 2021 Aug; Vol. 102 (8), pp. 1465-1472.e2. Date of Electronic Publication: 2021 Apr 16.
Publication Year :
2021

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate the efficacy of negative pressure massage treatment (NPMT) compared with manual lymphatic drainage (MLD) in women with chronic breast cancer-related lymphedema (LE). We hypothesized that NPMT would result in greater improvements in LE and upper limb function.<br />Design: Pilot single-blinded randomized controlled trial.<br />Setting: Health sciences university.<br />Participants: Of 64 women screened, 28 met eligibility requirements (ie, >18y of age; completed active treatment for breast cancer; had unilateral arm LE for ≥1y; were not receiving LE care; had stable LE) and were randomized to the NPMT (n=15) and control groups (n=13).<br />Interventions: The intervention group received NPMT and the control group received MLD; both received twelve 60-minute sessions over 4-6 weeks.<br />Main Outcome Measures: Bioimpedance (lymphedema index [L-Dex] units]), limb volume (mL) calculated from limb circumference, and Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand questionnaire (DASH) score.<br />Results: Outcomes were analyzed for 28 women. Compared to the MLD group, the NPMT group demonstrated greater improvement with a large effect size in L-Dex scores (P=.001; standardized mean difference [SMD]=-1.15; 95% confidence interval, -1.96 to -0.35) and interlimb volume differences (P=.038; SMD=-0.83; 95% confidence interval, -1.60 to -0.05). Differences in DASH scores were not statistically significant (P=.067).<br />Conclusions: Compared to MLD, treatment with NPMT resulted in greater improvement in L-Dex scores and interlimb volume differences in women with a duration of unilateral upper limb LE of >1 year. Our findings need to be confirmed in a larger randomized controlled trial.<br /> (Copyright © 2021 The American Congress of Rehabilitation Medicine. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
1532-821X
Volume :
102
Issue :
8
Database :
MEDLINE
Journal :
Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
33872573
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apmr.2021.03.022