Back to Search
Start Over
A Real-World Comparison of 1-Year Survival and Expenditures for Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacements: SAPIEN 3 Versus CoreValve Versus Evolut R.
- Source :
-
Value in health : the journal of the International Society for Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research [Value Health] 2021 Apr; Vol. 24 (4), pp. 497-504. Date of Electronic Publication: 2020 Dec 19. - Publication Year :
- 2021
-
Abstract
- Objectives: New versions of balloon-expandable and self-expandable valves for transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) have been developed, but few studies have examined the outcomes associated with these devices using national-level data. This study aimed to elucidate the clinical and economic outcomes of TAVR for aortic stenosis in Japan through an analysis of real-world data.<br />Methods: This retrospective cohort study was performed using data from patients with aortic stenosis who had undergone transfemoral TAVR with Edwards SAPIEN 3, Medtronic CoreValve, or Medtronic Evolut R valves throughout Japan from April 2016 to March 2018. Pacemaker implantation, mortality, and health expenditure were examined for each valve type during hospitalization and at 1 month, 3 months, 6 months, and 1 year. Generalized linear regression models and Cox proportional hazards models were used to examine the associations between the valve types and outcomes.<br />Results: We analyzed 7244 TAVR cases (SAPIEN 3: 5276, CoreValve: 418, and Evolut R: 1550) across 145 hospitals. The adjusted 1-year expenditures for SAPIEN 3, CoreValve, and Evolut R were $79 402, $76 125, and $75 527, respectively; SAPIEN 3 was significantly more expensive than the other valves (P < .05). The pacemaker implantation hazard ratios (95% confidence intervals) for CoreValve and Evolut R were significantly higher (P < .001) than SAPIEN 3 at 2.61 (2.07-3.27) and 1.80 (1.53-2.12), respectively. The mortality hazard ratios (95% confidence intervals) for CoreValve and Evolut R were not significant at 1.11 (0.84-1.46) and 1.22 (0.97-1.54), respectively.<br />Conclusions: SAPIEN 3 users had generally lower pacemaker implantation and mortality but higher expenditures than CoreValve and Evolut R users.<br /> (Copyright © 2020 ISPOR–The Professional Society for Health Economics and Outcomes Research. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)
- Subjects :
- Aged
Aged, 80 and over
Aortic Valve Stenosis mortality
Aortic Valve Stenosis surgery
Databases, Factual
Female
Humans
Insurance Claim Reporting
Japan epidemiology
Male
Proportional Hazards Models
Retrospective Studies
Risk Factors
Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement methods
Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement mortality
Treatment Outcome
Aortic Valve surgery
Aortic Valve Stenosis economics
Health Expenditures statistics & numerical data
Heart Valve Prosthesis economics
Pacemaker, Artificial economics
Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement economics
Subjects
Details
- Language :
- English
- ISSN :
- 1524-4733
- Volume :
- 24
- Issue :
- 4
- Database :
- MEDLINE
- Journal :
- Value in health : the journal of the International Society for Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research
- Publication Type :
- Academic Journal
- Accession number :
- 33840427
- Full Text :
- https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jval.2020.10.022