Back to Search Start Over

APBI Versus Ultra-APBI in the Elderly With Low-Risk Breast Cancer: A Comparative Analysis of Oncological Outcome and Late Toxicity.

Authors :
Hannoun-Lévi JM
Montagne L
Sumodhee S
Schiappa R
Boulahssass R
Gautier M
Gal J
Chand ME
Source :
International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics [Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys] 2021 Sep 01; Vol. 111 (1), pp. 56-67. Date of Electronic Publication: 2021 Apr 06.
Publication Year :
2021

Abstract

Purpose: Accelerated partial breast irradiation (APBI) represents a validated technique for low-risk breast cancer. Recently, ultra-APBI (uAPBI) using fewer than 5 fractions was described in the literature. We compared clinical outcomes and late toxicity after APBI or uAPBI in older patients.<br />Methods and Materials: Two cohorts of older patients (aged ≥70 years) with low-risk breast cancer treated with APBI (interstitial brachytherapy) were analyzed retrospectively. A total dose of 34 Gy in10 fractions (APBI) or 16 Gy in 1 fraction (uAPBI) was delivered from 2004 to 2012 and from 2013 to 2018, respectively. Oncologic outcome analyzed the cumulative incidence of local relapse, regional relapse, and distant metastases with disease-free survival, cause-specific survival, and overall survival. Late toxicity and cosmetic results were investigated.<br />Results: One hundred fifty-seven patients (APBI, n = 109 patients; uAPBI, n = 48 patients) underwent APBI according to the same selection criteria. Apart from the median follow-up (97 vs 72 months for APBI and uAPBI; P < .002), no significant difference was noted between the 2 groups. Regarding 6-year oncologic outcome, no significant difference was observed between APBI and uAPBI for local recurrence (1.3% vs 0%; P = .4), regional recurrence (2.5% vs 2.3%; P = .9), distant metastases (4.3% vs. 2.4%; P = .6), disease-free survival (85.2% vs. 82.2%; P = .8), cause-specific survival (96.7% vs. 96.2%; P = .9), and overall survival (86.7% vs. 82.2%; P = .7). Regarding late toxicity, no significant difference was observed between APBI and uAPBI (total complication number, 45 vs 33%; P = .173) with only grade 1 (88.4% vs. 95%) and grade 2 (11.6% vs. 5%) late toxicities (P = .677). Similarly, no significant difference was observed for excellent/good cosmetic results between the 2 cohorts (P = .98).<br />Conclusions: We report the first study comparing APBI versus uAPBI in a cohort of older patients with low-risk breast cancer. No significant difference was found between the 2 treatment groups regarding oncologic outcome, late toxicity, and cosmetic result. uAPBI based on a single fraction of brachytherapy represents an attractive option for therapeutic de-escalation in older patients with breast cancer.<br /> (Copyright © 2021 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
1879-355X
Volume :
111
Issue :
1
Database :
MEDLINE
Journal :
International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
33831490
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrobp.2021.03.052