Back to Search Start Over

Retrospective Comparison of Intramuscular Admixtures of Ketamine and Dexmedetomidine Versus Ketamine and Midazolam for Preoperative Sedation.

Authors :
Guthrie DB
Boorin MR
Sisti AR
Epstein RH
Romeiser JL
Lam DK
Gan TJ
Bennett-Guerrero E
Source :
Anesthesia progress [Anesth Prog] 2021 Mar 01; Vol. 68 (1), pp. 3-9.
Publication Year :
2021

Abstract

Precooperative children and patients with intellectual disabilities often require intramuscular (IM) sedation prior to the induction of general anesthesia (GA). Ketamine is an effective preinduction sedative but can produce significant adverse side effects. Dexmedetomidine, a sedative with sympatholytic and analgesic properties, may provide advantages when used in combination with ketamine. This retrospective study evaluated the efficacy and safety of IM ketamine with dexmedetomidine for preoperative sedation. We conducted a chart review of all patients (n = 105) treated for dental rehabilitation who received either IM ketamine and dexmedetomidine (study group, n = 74) or IM ketamine and midazolam (control group, n = 31) prior to induction of GA. No significant difference (p = .14) was observed in the time interval from IM administration to operating room entry (median [interquartile range]) between the study and control groups (5 [4-8] vs 5 [2-7] minutes). Patients who received IM dexmedetomidine exhibited significantly lower mean arterial pressures throughout the induction (p = .004) and had lower heart rates (p = .01) throughout the intraoperative period compared with patients who did not receive dexmedetomidine. The combination of dexmedetomidine and ketamine may provide effective and safe IM sedation prior to the induction of GA.<br /> (© 2021 by the American Dental Society of Anesthesiology.)

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
1878-7177
Volume :
68
Issue :
1
Database :
MEDLINE
Journal :
Anesthesia progress
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
33827122
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.2344/anpr-67-04-02