Back to Search Start Over

Collision-induced dissociation of [UO 2 (NO 3 )(O 2 )] - and reactions of product ions with H 2 O and O 2 .

Authors :
Bubas AR
Perez E
Metzler LJ
Rissler SD
Van Stipdonk MJ
Source :
Journal of mass spectrometry : JMS [J Mass Spectrom] 2021 May; Vol. 56 (5), pp. e4720.
Publication Year :
2021

Abstract

We recently reported a detailed investigation of the collision-induced dissociation (CID) of [UO <subscript>2</subscript> (NO <subscript>3</subscript> ) <subscript>3</subscript> ] <superscript>-</superscript> and [UO <subscript>2</subscript> (NO <subscript>3</subscript> ) <subscript>2</subscript> (O <subscript>2</subscript> )] <superscript>-</superscript> in a linear ion trap mass spectrometer (J. Mass Spectrom. DOI:10.1002/jms.4705). Here, we describe the CID of [UO <subscript>2</subscript> (NO <subscript>3</subscript> )(O <subscript>2</subscript> )] <superscript>-</superscript> which is created directly by ESI, or indirectly by simple elimination of O <subscript>2</subscript> from [UO <subscript>2</subscript> (NO <subscript>3</subscript> )(O <subscript>2</subscript> ) <subscript>2</subscript> ] <superscript>-</superscript> . CID of [UO <subscript>2</subscript> (NO <subscript>3</subscript> )(O <subscript>2</subscript> )] <superscript>-</superscript> creates product ions as at m/z 332 and m/z 318. The former may be formed directly by elimination of O <subscript>2</subscript> , while the latter required decomposition of a nitrate ligand and elimination of NO <subscript>2</subscript> . DFT calculations identify a pathway by which both product ions can be generated, which involves initial isomerization of [UO <subscript>2</subscript> (NO <subscript>3</subscript> )(O <subscript>2</subscript> )] <superscript>-</superscript> to create [UO <subscript>2</subscript> (O)(NO <subscript>2</subscript> )(O <subscript>2</subscript> )] <superscript>-</superscript> , from which elimination of NO <subscript>2</subscript> or O <subscript>2</subscript> will leave [UO <subscript>2</subscript> (O)(O <subscript>2</subscript> )] <superscript>-</superscript> or [UO <subscript>2</subscript> (O)(NO <subscript>2</subscript> )] <superscript>-</superscript> , respectively. For the latter product ion, the composition assignment of [UO <subscript>2</subscript> (O)(NO <subscript>2</subscript> )] <superscript>-</superscript> rather than [UO <subscript>2</subscript> (NO <subscript>3</subscript> )] <superscript>-</superscript> is supported by ion-molecule reaction behavior, and in particular, the fact that spontaneous addition of O <subscript>2</subscript> , which is predicted to be the dominant reaction pathway for [UO <subscript>2</subscript> (NO <subscript>3</subscript> )] <superscript>-</superscript> is not observed. Instead, the species reacts with H <subscript>2</subscript> O, which is predicted to be the favored pathway for [UO <subscript>2</subscript> (O)(NO <subscript>2</subscript> )] <superscript>-</superscript> . This result in particular demonstrates the utility of ion-molecule reactions to assist the determination of ion composition. As in our earlier study, we find that ions such as [UO <subscript>2</subscript> (O)(NO <subscript>2</subscript> )] <superscript>-</superscript> and [UO <subscript>2</subscript> (O)(O <subscript>2</subscript> )] <superscript>-</superscript> form H <subscript>2</subscript> O adducts, and calculations suggest these species spontaneously rearrange to create dihydroxides.<br /> (© 2021 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.)

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
1096-9888
Volume :
56
Issue :
5
Database :
MEDLINE
Journal :
Journal of mass spectrometry : JMS
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
33813763
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1002/jms.4720