Back to Search Start Over

How Patients Choose a Laryngologist: A Pilot Stated Preference Study.

Authors :
Fischman V
Wittenberg E
Song SA
Huston MN
Franco RA
Song PC
Naunheim MR
Source :
OTO open [OTO Open] 2021 Mar 11; Vol. 5 (1), pp. 2473974X21999601. Date of Electronic Publication: 2021 Mar 11 (Print Publication: 2021).
Publication Year :
2021

Abstract

Objective: Patients consider many factors when deciding how to receive medical care. This study used best-worst scaling (BWS), a technique novel to otolaryngology, to quantitatively examine preferences among patients choosing a laryngologist. Our objective was to quantify in a pilot cohort the relative importance patients place on a variety of attributes when seeking a laryngologist.<br />Study Design: BWS survey.<br />Setting: Academic voice clinic.<br />Methods: New patients were recruited to take a computerized BWS survey developed using attributes derived from patient input, expert opinion, and literature review. Attributes were grouped into 4 categories: physician reputation, physician qualifications, hospital-related factors, and other nonclinical factors. Responses were analyzed using multinomial logit regression to determine importance scores and associations with other variables.<br />Results: Eighty-seven of 93 patients recruited participated (93.5% response rate). Physician qualifications were the most important attributes to patients, with specialty laryngology training receiving the highest importance score (20.8; 95% CI, 20.2 to 21.5; P < .0001). Recommendations from referring physicians (15.6; 95% CI, 14.3 to 16.9) and use of cutting-edge technology (11.9; 95% CI, 10.7 to 13.1) were the second and third most important, respectively. Least important were nonclinical factors, including wait time to get an appointment (4.3; 95% CI, 2.8 to 5.8) and convenience of office location (1.5; 95% CI, 0.9 to 2.1). Just over half of patients (51.2%) reported willingness to wait 4 weeks for an appointment with a laryngologist. Older patients were less concerned with convenience-related factors.<br />Conclusion: Nonclinical factors were less important to patients than clinical factors, and laryngology-specific training was paramount. Stated preference methodologies can elucidate underlying preferences and help providers make care more patient centered.<br /> (© The Authors 2021.)

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
2473-974X
Volume :
5
Issue :
1
Database :
MEDLINE
Journal :
OTO open
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
33796810
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1177/2473974X21999601