Back to Search
Start Over
Initial Results of a Phase 2 Trial of 18 F-DOPA PET-Guided Dose-Escalated Radiation Therapy for Glioblastoma.
- Source :
-
International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics [Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys] 2021 Aug 01; Vol. 110 (5), pp. 1383-1395. Date of Electronic Publication: 2021 Mar 23. - Publication Year :
- 2021
-
Abstract
- Purpose: Our previous work demonstrated that 3,4-dihydroxy-6-[18F]-fluoro-L-phenylalanine ( <superscript>18</superscript> F-DOPA) positron emission tomography (PET) is sensitive and specific for identifying regions of high density and biologically aggressive glioblastoma. The purpose of this prospective phase 2 study was to determine the safety and efficacy of biologic-guided, dose-escalated radiation therapy (DERT) using <superscript>18</superscript> F-DOPA PET in patients with glioblastoma.<br />Methods and Materials: Patients with newly diagnosed, histologically confirmed glioblastoma aged ≥18 years without contraindications to <superscript>18</superscript> F-DOPA were eligible. Target volumes included 51, 60, and 76 Gy in 30 fractions with a simultaneous integrated boost, and concurrent and adjuvant temozolomide for 6 months. <superscript>18</superscript> F-DOPA PET imaging was used to guide DERT. The study was designed to detect a true progression-free survival (PFS) at 6 months (PFS6) rate ≥72.5% in O6-methylguanine methyltransferase (MGMT) unmethylated patients (DE-Un), with an overall significance level (alpha) of 0.20 and a power of 80%. Kaplan-Meier analysis was performed for PFS and overall survival (OS). Historical controls (HCs) included 139 patients (82 unmethylated) treated on prospective clinical trials or with standard RT at our institution. Toxicities were evaluated with Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events v4.0.<br />Results: Between January 2014 and December 2018, 75 evaluable patients were enrolled (39 DE-Un, 24 methylated [DE-Mth], and 12 indeterminate). PFS6 for DE-Un was 79.5% (95% confidence interval, 63.1%-90.1%). Median PFS was longer for DE-Un patients compared with historical controls (8.7 months vs 6.6 months; P = .017). OS was similarly longer, but the difference was not significant (16.0 vs 13.5 months; P = .13). OS was significantly improved for DE-Mth patients compared with HC-Mth (35.5 vs 23.3 months; P = .049) despite nonsignificant improvement in PFS (10.7 vs 9.0 months; P = .26). Grade 3 central nervous system necrosis occurred in 13% of patients, but treatment with bevacizumab improved symptoms in all cases.<br />Conclusions: <superscript>18</superscript> F-DOPA PET-guided DERT appears to be safe, and it significantly improves PFS in MGMT unmethylated glioblastoma. OS is significantly improved in MGMT methylated patients. Further investigation of <superscript>18</superscript> F-DOPA PET biologic guided DERT for glioblastoma is warranted.<br /> (Copyright © 2021 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)
- Subjects :
- Adult
Aged
Aged, 80 and over
Antineoplastic Agents, Alkylating therapeutic use
Antineoplastic Agents, Immunological therapeutic use
Bevacizumab therapeutic use
Brain Neoplasms diagnostic imaging
Brain Neoplasms drug therapy
Brain Neoplasms mortality
Chemotherapy, Adjuvant methods
Cognition radiation effects
Confidence Intervals
Dose Fractionation, Radiation
Female
Glioblastoma diagnostic imaging
Glioblastoma drug therapy
Glioblastoma mortality
Humans
Kaplan-Meier Estimate
Male
Methylation
Middle Aged
O(6)-Methylguanine-DNA Methyltransferase metabolism
Progression-Free Survival
Prospective Studies
Quality of Life
Temozolomide therapeutic use
Young Adult
Brain Neoplasms radiotherapy
Dihydroxyphenylalanine analogs & derivatives
Glioblastoma radiotherapy
Positron-Emission Tomography
Radiopharmaceuticals
Radiotherapy, Image-Guided
Subjects
Details
- Language :
- English
- ISSN :
- 1879-355X
- Volume :
- 110
- Issue :
- 5
- Database :
- MEDLINE
- Journal :
- International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics
- Publication Type :
- Academic Journal
- Accession number :
- 33771703
- Full Text :
- https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrobp.2021.03.032