Back to Search
Start Over
Mentality of pregnant women and obstetric healthcare workers about prenatal SARS-CoV-2 testing: A regional survey over the first wave of the COVID-19 pandemic in Japan.
- Source :
-
The journal of obstetrics and gynaecology research [J Obstet Gynaecol Res] 2021 May; Vol. 47 (5), pp. 1763-1771. Date of Electronic Publication: 2021 Mar 17. - Publication Year :
- 2021
-
Abstract
- Aim: To clarify the mentality of pregnant women and obstetric healthcare workers about prenatal severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) screening testing.<br />Methods: A multicenter questionnaire survey about prenatal SARS-CoV-2 screening testing was conducted among pregnant women, midwives and nurses (M&Ns), and obstetricians at all delivery facilities in Fukui Prefecture between June 30, 2020 and July 22, 2020.<br />Results: Of 297 pregnant women, 150 (50.5%) underwent prenatal polymerase chain reaction (PCR) testing, and 107 of them (71.3%) answered that because of prenatal PCR tests, they could give birth with relief. One hundred forty-five (48.8%) were concerned about the disadvantages of receiving positive prenatal PCR results. Of 287āM&Ns, 151 (52.6%) answered that prenatal PCR screening testing could reduce anxiety about infection to themselves; this belief was more common among M&Ns working at the nonreception facility than among those at COVID-19 reception facilities (60.7% vs. 47.1%, P = 0.02). Of 57 obstetricians, 31 (54.4%) agreed to prenatal SARS-CoV-2 PCR screening testing, the rate of which was significantly higher among obstetricians at nonreception facilities than those at reception facilities (70.3% vs. 25.0%, Pā<ā0.01). Fourteen obstetricians (24.6%) were concerned about excessive medical treatment for asymptomatic pregnant women with false-positive PCR results.<br />Conclusions: Pregnant women experience anxieties during the COVID-19 pandemic, and prenatal SARS-CoV-2 screening may reduce their anxiety to some extent. However, obstetrics staff at COVID-19 reception facilities are aware of the limits of prenatal screening and are concerned about excessive medical intervention due to false-positive results.<br /> (© 2021 Japan Society of Obstetrics and Gynecology.)
Details
- Language :
- English
- ISSN :
- 1447-0756
- Volume :
- 47
- Issue :
- 5
- Database :
- MEDLINE
- Journal :
- The journal of obstetrics and gynaecology research
- Publication Type :
- Academic Journal
- Accession number :
- 33733569
- Full Text :
- https://doi.org/10.1111/jog.14740