Back to Search
Start Over
Efficacy and Safety of Sacubitril/Valsartan in Japanese Patients With Chronic Heart Failure and Reduced Ejection Fraction - Results From the PARALLEL-HF Study.
- Source :
-
Circulation journal : official journal of the Japanese Circulation Society [Circ J] 2021 Apr 23; Vol. 85 (5), pp. 584-594. Date of Electronic Publication: 2021 Mar 16. - Publication Year :
- 2021
-
Abstract
- Background: In the Prospective Comparison of angiotensin receptor neprilysin inhibitor (ARNI) With ACEi to Determine Impact on Global Mortality and Morbidity in Heart Failure (PARADIGM-HF) study, treatment with sacubitril/valsartan reduced the primary outcome of cardiovascular (CV) death and heart failure (HF) hospitalization compared with enalapril in patients with chronic HF and reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF). A prospective randomized trial was conducted to assess the efficacy and safety of sacubitril/valsartan in Japanese HFrEF patients.<br />Methods and results: In the Prospective comparison of ARNI with ACEi to determine the noveL beneficiaL trEatment vaLue in Japanese Heart Failure patients (PARALLEL-HF) study, 225 Japanese HFrEF patients (New York Heart Association [NYHA] class II-IV, left ventricular ejection fraction [LVEF] ≤35%) were randomized (1 : 1) to receive sacubitril/valsartan 200 mg bid or enalapril 10 mg bid. Over a median follow up of 33.9 months, no significant between-group difference was observed for the primary composite outcome of CV death and HF hospitalization (HR 1.09; 95% CI 0.65-1.82; P=0.6260). Early and sustained reductions in N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) from baseline were observed with sacubitril/valsartan compared with enalapril (between-group difference: Week 2: 25.7%, P<0.01; Month 6: 18.9%, P=0.01, favoring sacubitril/valsartan). There was no significant difference in the changes in NYHA class and Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire (KCCQ) clinical summary score at Week 8 and Month 6. Sacubitril/valsartan was well tolerated with fewer study drug discontinuations due to adverse events, although the sacubitril/valsartan group had a higher proportion of patients with hypotension.<br />Conclusions: In Japanese patients with HFrEF, there was no difference in reduction in the risk of CV death or HF hospitalization between sacubitril/valsartan and enalapril, and sacubitril/valsartan was safe and well tolerated.
- Subjects :
- Aminobutyrates adverse effects
Angiotensin Receptor Antagonists adverse effects
Biphenyl Compounds
Drug Combinations
Enalapril adverse effects
Humans
Japan
Prospective Studies
Stroke Volume
Tetrazoles adverse effects
Treatment Outcome
Valsartan
Ventricular Function, Left
Heart Failure drug therapy
Ventricular Dysfunction, Left
Subjects
Details
- Language :
- English
- ISSN :
- 1347-4820
- Volume :
- 85
- Issue :
- 5
- Database :
- MEDLINE
- Journal :
- Circulation journal : official journal of the Japanese Circulation Society
- Publication Type :
- Academic Journal
- Accession number :
- 33731544
- Full Text :
- https://doi.org/10.1253/circj.CJ-20-0854