Back to Search Start Over

The effect of spike mutations on SARS-CoV-2 neutralization.

Authors :
Rees-Spear C
Muir L
Griffith SA
Heaney J
Aldon Y
Snitselaar JL
Thomas P
Graham C
Seow J
Lee N
Rosa A
Roustan C
Houlihan CF
Sanders RW
Gupta RK
Cherepanov P
Stauss HJ
Nastouli E
Doores KJ
van Gils MJ
McCoy LE
Source :
Cell reports [Cell Rep] 2021 Mar 23; Vol. 34 (12), pp. 108890. Date of Electronic Publication: 2021 Mar 06.
Publication Year :
2021

Abstract

Multiple severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) vaccines show protective efficacy, which is most likely mediated by neutralizing antibodies recognizing the viral entry protein, spike. Because new SARS-CoV-2 variants are emerging rapidly, as exemplified by the B.1.1.7, B.1.351, and P.1 lineages, it is critical to understand whether antibody responses induced by infection with the original SARS-CoV-2 virus or current vaccines remain effective. In this study, we evaluate neutralization of a series of mutated spike pseudotypes based on divergence from SARS-CoV and then compare neutralization of the B.1.1.7 spike pseudotype and individual mutations. Spike-specific monoclonal antibody neutralization is reduced dramatically; in contrast, polyclonal antibodies from individuals infected in early 2020 remain active against most mutated spike pseudotypes, but potency is reduced in a minority of samples. This work highlights that changes in SARS-CoV-2 spike can alter neutralization sensitivity and underlines the need for effective real-time monitoring of emerging mutations and their effect on vaccine efficacy.<br />Competing Interests: Declaration of interests Amsterdam UMC submitted a patent application on SARS-CoV-2 monoclonal antibodies, some of which were used in this study.<br /> (Copyright © 2021 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
2211-1247
Volume :
34
Issue :
12
Database :
MEDLINE
Journal :
Cell reports
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
33713594
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.celrep.2021.108890