Back to Search Start Over

Association of Long-term Use of Antihypertensive Medications With Late Outcomes Among Patients With Aortic Dissection.

Authors :
Chen SW
Chan YH
Lin CP
Wu VC
Cheng YT
Chen DY
Chang SH
Hung KC
Chu PH
Chou AH
Source :
JAMA network open [JAMA Netw Open] 2021 Mar 01; Vol. 4 (3), pp. e210469. Date of Electronic Publication: 2021 Mar 01.
Publication Year :
2021

Abstract

Importance: The associations between long-term treatment of aortic dissection with various medications and late patient outcomes are poorly understood.<br />Objective: To compare late outcomes after long-term use of β-blockers, angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEIs), angiotensin receptor blockers (ARBs), or other antihypertensive medications (controls) among patients treated for aortic dissection.<br />Design, Setting, and Participants: This population-based retrospective cohort study using the National Health Insurance Research Database in Taiwan included 6978 adult patients with a first-ever aortic dissection who survived to hospital discharge during the period between January 1, 2001, and December 31, 2013, and who received during the first 90 days after discharge a prescription for an ACEI, ARB, β-blocker, or at least 1 other antihypertensive medication. Data analysis was conducted from July 2019 to June 2020.<br />Exposure: Long-term use of β-blockers, ACEIs, or ARBs, with use of other antihypertensive medications as a control.<br />Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcomes of interest were all-cause mortality, death due to aortic aneurism or dissection, later aortic operation, major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events, hospital readmission, and new-onset dialysis.<br />Results: Of 6978 total participants, 3492 received a β-blocker, 1729 received an ACEI or ARB, and 1757 received another antihypertension drug. Compared with patients in the other 2 groups, those in the β-blocker group were younger (mean [SD] age, 62.1 [13.9] years vs 68.7 [13.5] years for ACEIs or ARBs and 69.9 [13.8] years for controls) and comprised more male patients (2520 [72.2%] vs 1161 [67.1%] for ACEIs or ARBs and 1224 [69.7%] for controls). The prevalence of medicated hypertension was highest in the ACEI or ARB group (1039 patients [60.1%]), followed by the control group (896 patients [51.0%]), and was lowest in the β-blocker group (1577 patients [45.2%]). Patients who underwent surgery for type A aortic dissection were more likely to be prescribed β-blockers (1134 patients [32.5%]) than an ACEI or ARB (309 patients [17.9%]) or another antihypertension medication (376 patients [21.4%]). After adjusting for multiple propensity scores, there were no significant differences in any of the clinical characteristics among the 3 groups. No differences in the risks for all outcomes were observed between the ACEI or ARB and β-blocker groups. The risk of all-cause hospital readmission was significantly lower in the ACEI or ARB group (subdistribution hazard ratio [HR], 0.92; 95% CI, 0.84-0.997) and β-blocker group (subdistribution HR, 0.87; 95% CI, 0.81-0.94) than in the control group. Moreover, the risk of all-cause mortality was lower in the ACEI or ARB group (HR, 0.79; 95% CI, 0.71-0.89) and the β-blocker group (HR, 0.82; 95% CI, 0.73-0.91) than in the control group. In addition, the risk of all-cause mortality was lower in the ARB group than in the ACEI group (HR, 0.85; 95% CI, 0.76-0.95).<br />Conclusions and Relevance: The use of β-blockers, ACEIs, or ARBs was associated with benefits in the long-term treatment of aortic dissection.

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
2574-3805
Volume :
4
Issue :
3
Database :
MEDLINE
Journal :
JAMA network open
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
33656527
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.0469