Range and Consistency of Infection Outcomes Reported in Trials Conducted in Kidney Transplant Recipients: A Systematic Review.

Background: Infection remains a leading cause of death in kidney transplant recipients. This study aimed to assess the scope and consistency of infection outcomes reported in contemporary trials conducted in kidney transplant recipients.
Methods: A literature review of all randomized trials and trial protocols reporting infection outcomes in adult kidney transplant recipients was identified in the Cochrane Kidney and Transplant Specialized Register from January 2014 to July 2019. Characteristics and infection outcomes from the trials were analyzed.
Results: From 102 included trials, 772 outcome measures were extracted and categorized into 216 unique measures with a median of 3.2 outcome measures per trial (range: 1-9). Measures were further grouped into 32 outcomes based on site of infection (14 outcomes) and organism (18 outcomes). The most commonly reported site-specific outcome and organism-specific outcome were systemic infection (71% trials) and cytomegalovirus infection (62% trials), respectively. Outcome metric and methods of aggregation included mean, median, proportion, proportional change, and number of patients with at least 1 episode. Across all trials, measures were assessed at 55 different time points with a range of 1-11 time points per trial.
Conclusions: Infection outcomes in kidney transplant recipients were frequently reported by site and organism but varied widely in terms of outcome, metrics, method of aggregation, and time point of measurement. Establishment of core outcomes for infection based on the shared priorities of patients/caregivers and health professionals may improve the consistency, comparability, and usefulness of trial evidence.
Competing Interests: S.C. is supported by the Australian National Health and Medical Research Council (NHMRC) Postgraduate Scholarship, the Microba recipient grant, the Metro South Research Support Scheme, and the Royal Australasian College of Physicians (RACP) Jacquot NHMRC Research Excellence top-up award. E.A. is supported by a NHMRC Postgraduate Scholarship and RACP Jacquot NHMRC Award for Excellence. C.M.H. is the recipient of research grants paid to her institution from Baxter Healthcare and Fresenius Medical Care and from Otsuka, Janssen, and GlaxoSmithKline for trial steering committee activities, paid to her institution. D.W.J. has received consultancy fees, research grants, speaker’s honoraria, and travel sponsorships from Baxter Healthcare and Fresenius Medical Care. He has received consultancy fees from Astra Zeneca and AWAK, speaker’s honoraria from Ono, and travel sponsorships from Amgen. He is a current recipient of an Australian NHMRC Practitioner Fellowship. N.M.I. has received consultancy fees and speakers honoraria from Alexion Pharmaceuticals, Novo Nordisk, and Amgen. A.T. is supported by the NHMRC Research Fellowship. A.K.V. receives grant support from the Royal Australasian College of Physicians (Jacquot Research Establishment Award) and the Princess Alexandra Research Foundation. D.B. receives institutional research grant funding from CareDx, speaking honoraria from CareDx and Veloxis and is a consultant for AlloVir, Amplyx, Argenyx, CareDx, Medeor, Natera, Sanofi, and Veloxis. D.B. is supported by NIDDK U01 DK116042-01 and R01DK102981. The other authors declare no conflicts of interest.
(Copyright © 2021 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.)