Back to Search Start Over

Characterization of Ebola Virus Risk to Bedside Providers in an Intensive Care Environment.

Authors :
Biondi MJ
Garnett L
Bello A
Funk D
Poliquin PG
Jones S
Tierney K
Tran K
Kozak RA
Leung A
Grolla A
Nakamura C
Soule G
Ranadheera C
Hagan M
Dhaliwal A
Kobasa D
Falzarano D
Bovendo HF
Feldmann H
Kesselman M
Hansen G
Gren J
Mortimer T
Racine T
Deschambault Y
Edmonds J
Aminian S
Saurette R
Allan M
Rondeau L
Huynh J
Hadder S
Press C
DeGraff C
Kucas S
Kubay J
Azanarsky K
Cook BWM
Hancock BJ
Kumar A
Soni R
Schantz D
McKitrick J
Warner B
Griffin BD
Qiu X
Kobinger GP
Safronetz D
Wood H
R Stein D
Cutts T
Pickering B
Kenny J
Theriault S
Menec L
Vendramelli R
Higgins S
Banadyga L
Liu G
Rahim MN
Kasloff S
Sloan A
He S
Tailor N
Albietz A
Wong G
Gray M
Feldmann F
Marzi A
Risi G
Strong JE
Source :
Microorganisms [Microorganisms] 2021 Feb 26; Vol. 9 (3). Date of Electronic Publication: 2021 Feb 26.
Publication Year :
2021

Abstract

Background: The 2014-2016 Ebola outbreak in West Africa recapitulated that nosocomial spread of Ebola virus could occur and that health care workers were at particular risk including notable cases in Europe and North America. These instances highlighted the need for centers to better prepare for potential Ebola virus cases; including understanding how the virus spreads and which interventions pose the greatest risk.<br />Methods: We created a fully equipped intensive care unit (ICU), within a Biosafety Level 4 (BSL4) laboratory, and infected multiple sedated non-human primates (NHPs) with Ebola virus. While providing bedside care, we sampled blood, urine, and gastric residuals; as well as buccal, ocular, nasal, rectal, and skin swabs, to assess the risks associated with routine care. We also assessed the physical environment at end-point.<br />Results: Although viral RNA was detectable in blood as early as three days post-infection, it was not detectable in the urine, gastric fluid, or swabs until late-stage disease. While droplet spread and fomite contamination were present on a few of the surfaces that were routinely touched while providing care in the ICU for the infected animal, these may have been abrogated through good routine hygiene practices.<br />Conclusions: Overall this study has helped further our understanding of which procedures may pose the highest risk to healthcare providers and provides temporal evidence of this over the clinical course of disease.<br />Competing Interests: The authors declare no competing interest. Correspondence and requests for materials should be addressed to James E. Strong (jim.strong@canada.ca).

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
2076-2607
Volume :
9
Issue :
3
Database :
MEDLINE
Journal :
Microorganisms
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
33652895
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms9030498