Back to Search
Start Over
Item banks for measurement of refractive error-specific quality of life.
- Source :
-
Ophthalmic & physiological optics : the journal of the British College of Ophthalmic Opticians (Optometrists) [Ophthalmic Physiol Opt] 2021 May; Vol. 41 (3), pp. 591-602. Date of Electronic Publication: 2021 Mar 02. - Publication Year :
- 2021
-
Abstract
- Purpose: To evaluate the psychometric properties of refractive error-specific quality of life (QoL) item banks and assess their performance using computerised adaptive testing (CAT) simulations.<br />Methods: In this cross-sectional study a 392-item questionnaire, grouped under 11 QoL domains, was interviewer-administered to 305 people with refractive error [mean age ± S.D., 30.5 ± 14.1 (range (18 to 83) years; male, 50.5%; mean ± S.D. spherical equivalent refractive error -2.4 ± 2.9 (range: -15.0 to +11.0) Dioptres; spectacles (n = 257), contact lens (n = 37), refractive surgery (n = 25), uncorrected refractive error (n = 57)]. Rasch analysis was conducted on each QoL domain using the Andrich rating scale model to investigate parameters including response category functioning, person- and item-reliability, infit and outfit statistics, unidimensionality, targeting, differential item functioning and local item dependency. The resulting item banks underwent CAT simulations in 1,000 cases with 'high' and 'moderate' precision stopping rules.<br />Results: Rasch analysis iterations resulted in 13 refractive error-specific item banks (Convenience, Health concerns, Economic, Activity limitation, Mobility, Emotional, Social, Visual symptoms frequency, Visual symptoms severity, Visual symptoms bothersome, Comfort symptoms frequency, Comfort symptoms severity and Comfort symptoms bothersome), containing a total of 366 items. The item banks had good psychometric properties including satisfactory measurement precision, infit and outfit statistics and unidimensionality. In CAT simulations, the mean number of items required to achieve high and moderate measurement precision was 9.4 and 4.7, respectively.<br />Conclusion: Overall, refractive error-specific QoL item banks show promise in their ability to comprehensively and precisely evaluate a range of quality of life parameters. These items banks when administered using a CAT system offer unique outcome tools for implementation in clinical trials, healthcare and research.<br /> (© 2021 The Authors Ophthalmic and Physiological Optics © 2021 The College of Optometrists.)
- Subjects :
- Adolescent
Adult
Aged
Aged, 80 and over
Cross-Sectional Studies
Female
Humans
Male
Middle Aged
Refractive Errors physiopathology
Refractive Errors therapy
Surveys and Questionnaires
Visual Acuity
Young Adult
Computer Simulation
Contact Lenses
Eyeglasses
Psychometrics methods
Quality of Life
Refractive Errors psychology
Subjects
Details
- Language :
- English
- ISSN :
- 1475-1313
- Volume :
- 41
- Issue :
- 3
- Database :
- MEDLINE
- Journal :
- Ophthalmic & physiological optics : the journal of the British College of Ophthalmic Opticians (Optometrists)
- Publication Type :
- Academic Journal
- Accession number :
- 33650713
- Full Text :
- https://doi.org/10.1111/opo.12792