Back to Search Start Over

Comparison of 12 surrogates to characterize CT radiation risk across a clinical population.

Authors :
Ria F
Fu W
Hoye J
Segars WP
Kapadia AJ
Samei E
Source :
European radiology [Eur Radiol] 2021 Sep; Vol. 31 (9), pp. 7022-7030. Date of Electronic Publication: 2021 Feb 23.
Publication Year :
2021

Abstract

Objectives: Quantifying radiation burden is essential for justification, optimization, and personalization of CT procedures and can be characterized by a variety of risk surrogates inducing different radiological risk reflections. This study compared how twelve such metrics can characterize risk across patient populations.<br />Methods: This study included 1394 CT examinations (abdominopelvic and chest). Organ doses were calculated using Monte Carlo methods. The following risk surrogates were considered: volume computed tomography dose index (CTDI <subscript>vol</subscript> ), dose-length product (DLP), size-specific dose estimate (SSDE), DLP-based effective dose (ED <subscript>k</subscript> ), dose to a defining organ (OD <subscript>D</subscript> ), effective dose and risk index based on organ doses (ED <subscript>OD</subscript> , RI), and risk index for a 20-year-old patient (RI <subscript>rp</subscript> ). The last three metrics were also calculated for a reference ICRP-110 model (OD <subscript>D,0</subscript> , ED <subscript>0</subscript> , and RI <subscript>0</subscript> ). Lastly, motivated by the ICRP, an adjusted-effective dose was calculated as [Formula: see text]. A linear regression was applied to assess each metric's dependency on RI. The results were characterized in terms of risk sensitivity index (RSI) and risk differentiability index (RDI).<br />Results: The analysis reported significant differences between the metrics with ED <subscript>r</subscript> showing the best concordance with RI in terms of RSI and RDI. Across all metrics and protocols, RSI ranged between 0.37 (SSDE) and 1.29 (RI <subscript>0</subscript> ); RDI ranged between 0.39 (ED <subscript>k</subscript> ) and 0.01 (ED <subscript>r</subscript> ) cancers × 10 <superscript>3</superscript> patients × 100 mGy.<br />Conclusion: Different risk surrogates lead to different population risk characterizations. ED <subscript>r</subscript> exhibited a close characterization of population risk, also showing the best differentiability. Care should be exercised in drawing risk predictions from unrepresentative risk metrics applied to a population.<br />Key Points: • Radiation risk characterization in CT populations is strongly affected by the surrogate used to describe it. • Different risk surrogates can lead to different characterization of population risk. • Healthcare professionals should exercise care in ascribing an implicit risk to factors that do not closely reflect risk.<br /> (© 2021. European Society of Radiology.)

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
1432-1084
Volume :
31
Issue :
9
Database :
MEDLINE
Journal :
European radiology
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
33624163
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-021-07753-9