Back to Search Start Over

Comparison of Central Venous Port Procedures Between Puncture vs . Cut-down and Residents vs . Senior Surgeons.

Authors :
Otsubo R
Yano H
Matsumoto M
Tanaka A
Nonaka T
Hidaka S
Matsumoto K
Tsuchiya T
Sato S
Nagayasu T
Source :
In vivo (Athens, Greece) [In Vivo] 2021 Mar-Apr; Vol. 35 (2), pp. 1197-1204.
Publication Year :
2021

Abstract

Background/aim: To compare operative results between venous puncture (P) with real-time ultrasonography vs. cut-down (CD) with preoperative ultrasonography for totally implantable central vein access device (TICVAD) implantation performed by residents (R) vs. senior surgeons (S).<br />Patients and Methods: Adult oncologic patients (n=268) undergoing TICVAD implantations were retrospectively compared between 172 Ps and 96 CDs. Then, we compared Ps performed by R (P-R, n=131) and S (P-S, n=41) and CDs performed by R (CD-R, n=59) and S (CD-S, n=37).<br />Results: Median operation times were 40 min in the P group and 53.5 min in the CD group, and times were significantly shorter for P-S and CD-S. Completion rates were comparable for each method and each surgeon. Intraoperative complication rates were 3.8% (P-R), 2.4% (P-S), and 0% (CD-R and CD-S).<br />Conclusion: P with real-time ultrasonography did not avoid complications compared to CD with preoperative ultrasonography. The latter performed safely even by residents.<br /> (Copyright© 2021, International Institute of Anticancer Research (Dr. George J. Delinasios), All rights reserved.)

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
1791-7549
Volume :
35
Issue :
2
Database :
MEDLINE
Journal :
In vivo (Athens, Greece)
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
33622921
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.21873/invivo.12369