Back to Search Start Over

Benchmark study comparing liftover tools for genome conversion of epigenome sequencing data.

Authors :
Luu PL
Ong PT
Dinh TP
Clark SJ
Source :
NAR genomics and bioinformatics [NAR Genom Bioinform] 2020 Aug 06; Vol. 2 (3), pp. lqaa054. Date of Electronic Publication: 2020 Aug 06 (Print Publication: 2020).
Publication Year :
2020

Abstract

As reference genome assemblies are updated there is a need to convert epigenome sequence data from older genome assemblies to newer versions, to facilitate data integration and visualization on the same coordinate system. Conversion can be done by re-alignment of the original sequence data to the new assembly or by converting the coordinates of the data between assemblies using a mapping file, an approach referred to as 'liftover'. Compared to re-alignment approaches, liftover is a more rapid and cost-effective solution. Here, we benchmark six liftover tools commonly used for conversion between genome assemblies by coordinates, including UCSC liftOver , rtracklayer::liftOver , CrossMap , NCBI Remap , flo  and segment_liftover to determine how they performed for whole genome bisulphite sequencing (WGBS) and ChIP-seq data. Our results show high correlation between the six tools for conversion of 43 WGBS paired samples. For the chromatin sequencing data we found from interval conversion of 366 ChIP-Seq datasets, segment_liftover generates more reliable results than USCS liftOver . However, we found some regions do not always remain the same after liftover. To further increase the accuracy of liftover and avoid misleading results, we developed a three-step guideline that removes aberrant regions to ensure more robust genome conversion between reference assemblies.<br /> (© The Author(s) 2019. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of NAR Genomics and Bioinformatics.)

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
2631-9268
Volume :
2
Issue :
3
Database :
MEDLINE
Journal :
NAR genomics and bioinformatics
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
33575605
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1093/nargab/lqaa054