Back to Search Start Over

Comparison of Cell Viability and Chemical Composition of Six Latest Generation Orthodontic Wires.

Authors :
Escobar LM
Rivera JR
Arbelaez E
Torres LF
Villafañe A
Díaz-Báez D
Mora I
Lafaurie GI
Tanaka M
Source :
International journal of biomaterials [Int J Biomater] 2021 Jan 27; Vol. 2021, pp. 8885290. Date of Electronic Publication: 2021 Jan 27 (Print Publication: 2021).
Publication Year :
2021

Abstract

Orthodontic wires are made of alloys containing different metals, including nickel. It is important to evaluate their biocompatibility prior to use, owing to their long-term use in patients. This in vitro study compared the cytotoxicity and chemical composition of six latest orthodontic wires: Fantasia®, Tanzo®, FLI®, NT3®, DuoForce®, and Gummetal®. The before-use group consisted of wires that were not used in the mouth, and the after-use group consisted of wires that were used in the mouth for two months. The wires were placed in contact with human gingival fibroblasts (HGF) for 72 h, and cytotoxicity was determined using the resazurin test. The chemical composition and surface characterisation were evaluated by spectrometry and scanning electron microscopy. The groups were compared using ANOVA and Kruskal-Wallis test. Only the FLI® wires produced a 36% reduction in HGF viability ( p < 0.05) and presented greater irregularities and loss of polymer structure. After-use wires showed a significant reduction in the percentage of nickel and the appearance of new elements (oxygen and carbon). Therefore, it can be concluded that no toxic ion release was noticed in this study. Rhodium-coated wires were more stable than PTFE-coated wires, and only the FLI® wires showed a slight cytotoxic effect.<br />Competing Interests: The authors declare no conflicts of interest.<br /> (Copyright © 2021 Lina M. Escobar et al.)

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
1687-8787
Volume :
2021
Database :
MEDLINE
Journal :
International journal of biomaterials
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
33574848
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1155/2021/8885290