Back to Search
Start Over
Practice Patterns and Challenges of Performing and Interpreting Prostate MRI: A Survey by the Society of Abdominal Radiology Prostate Disease-Focused Panel.
- Source :
-
AJR. American journal of roentgenology [AJR Am J Roentgenol] 2021 Apr; Vol. 216 (4), pp. 952-959. Date of Electronic Publication: 2021 Feb 10. - Publication Year :
- 2021
-
Abstract
- OBJECTIVE. The purpose of this study was to report on the practice patterns and challenges of performing and interpreting prostate MRI. SUBJECTS AND METHODS. An electronic survey regarding prostate MRI practice patterns and challenges was sent to members of the Society of Abdominal Radiology. RESULTS. The response rate was 15% (212/1446). Most (65%) of the respondents were academic abdominal radiologists with 1-5 (52%), 6-10 (20%), 11-20 (15%), and more than 20 (5%) years of experience in reporting prostate MRI. The numbers of prostate MRI examinations reported per week were 0-5 (43%), 6-10 (38%), 11-20 (12%), 21-30 (5%), and more than 30 (2%). Imaging was performed at 3 T (58%), 1.5 T (20%), or either (21%), and most examinations (83%) were performed without an endorectal coil. Highest b values ranged from 800 to 5000 s/mm <superscript>2</superscript> ; 1400 s/mm <superscript>2</superscript> (26%) and 1500 s/mm <superscript>2</superscript> (30%) were the most common. Most respondents (79%) acquired dynamic contrast-enhanced images with temporal resolution of less than 10 seconds. Most (71%) of the prostate MRI studies were used for fusion biopsy. PI-RADS version 2 was used by 92% of the respondents and template reporting by 80%. Challenges to performing and interpreting prostate MRI were scored on a 1-5 Likert scale (1, easy; 2, somewhat easy; 3, neutral; 4, somewhat difficult; 5, very difficult). The median scores were 2 or 3 for patient preparatory factors. Image acquisition and reporting factors were scored 1-2, except for performing spectroscopy or using an endorectal coil, both of which scored 4. Acquiring patient history scored 2 and quality factors scored 3. CONCLUSION. Most radiologists perform prostate MRI at 3 T without an endorectal coil and interpret the images using PI-RADS version 2. Challenges include obtaining quality images, acquiring feedback, and variability in the interpretation of PI-RADS scores.
- Subjects :
- Humans
Male
Prostate pathology
Prostatic Neoplasms diagnosis
Societies, Medical
Surveys and Questionnaires
Magnetic Resonance Imaging methods
Magnetic Resonance Imaging standards
Magnetic Resonance Imaging statistics & numerical data
Practice Patterns, Physicians' statistics & numerical data
Prostate diagnostic imaging
Prostatic Neoplasms diagnostic imaging
Subjects
Details
- Language :
- English
- ISSN :
- 1546-3141
- Volume :
- 216
- Issue :
- 4
- Database :
- MEDLINE
- Journal :
- AJR. American journal of roentgenology
- Publication Type :
- Academic Journal
- Accession number :
- 33566638
- Full Text :
- https://doi.org/10.2214/AJR.20.23256