Perceived 'optimal efficiency': theorization and conceptualization for development and implementation.

We recently advanced the study of positive psychology by introducing the theory of optimization , which explains the underlying process of optimal best. Our continuing research interest has led us to a newly developed concept, termed as 'optimal efficiency'. Optimal efficiency , we contend, focuses on the utilization of resources as well as the amount of time and effort that a person would have to expend during the course of his/her learning. How much time and effort, for example, should a student expend before it is perceived as being 'inefficient'? Optimal efficiency, in this analysis, is concerned with an important relationship - namely: the minimization of expenditure of time, effort, resources, etc. versus the maximization in productivity. Perceived efficiency is related to the teaching and training of judgment, decision making, autonomy, and self-determination - for example, in terms of successful schooling, a student has to decide whether it is worthwhile to expend so much time and effort on a given task when he/she may not necessarily pass. In our conceptual analysis and proposition of optimal efficiency, we consider the impact of cognitive load theory , which places emphasis on calculated investment and subsequent use of cognitive resources to process information for the purpose of achieving effective learning in a subject matter. Using cognitive load theory as a basis, we attempt to validate the concept of optimal efficiency by taking into account three main types of cognitive load imposition: extraneous, intrinsic, and germane. For example, we consider the possibility that a reduction in extraneous cognitive load imposition could instill a perception of efficiency, resulting in a person's achievement of optimal best. Emphasis on encouragement of germane cognitive load, in contrast, could be perceived as being more efficient, likewise yielding exceptional outcomes in a subject matter.
Competing Interests: The authors declare no conflict of interest.
(© 2021 The Author(s).)