Back to Search
Start Over
Cost-Effectiveness of Providing the Depression Care for People With Cancer Program to Patients With Prostate Cancer in the United States.
- Source :
-
Value in health : the journal of the International Society for Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research [Value Health] 2021 Feb; Vol. 24 (2), pp. 216-226. Date of Electronic Publication: 2020 Oct 31. - Publication Year :
- 2021
-
Abstract
- Objectives: The Depression Care for People with Cancer program (DCPC) is a cost-effective depression care model for UK patients with cancer. However, DCPC's cost-effectiveness in the United States is unknown, particularly for patients with prostate cancer in the United States. This study evaluates the health and economic impact of providing DCPC to patients with prostate cancer.<br />Methods: DCPC was compared with usual care in a mathematical model that simulates depression and its outcomes in a hypothetical cohort of US patients with prostate cancer. DCPC was modeled as a sequential combination of universal depression screening, post-screening evaluations, and first-line combination therapy. Primary outcomes were lifetime direct costs of depression care, quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs), and incremental cost-effectiveness ratios. Secondary outcomes included life expectancy, number of depression-free months and lifetime depressive episodes, duration of depressive episodes, cumulative incidence of depression, lifetime depression diagnoses/misdiagnoses, and the cumulative incidence of maintenance therapy for depression. Sensitivity analyses were used to examine uncertainty.<br />Results: In the base case, DCPC dominated usual care by offering 0.11 more QALYs for $2500 less per patient (from averted misdiagnoses). DCPC also offered 5 extra depression-free months, shorter depressive episodes, and a lower chance of maintenance therapy. DCPC's trade-offs were a higher cumulative incidence of depression and more lifetime depressive episodes. Life expectancy was identical under usual care and DCPC. Sensitivity analyses indicate that DCPC was almost always preferable to usual care.<br />Conclusion: Compared with usual care, DCPC may offer more value to US patients with prostate cancer. DCPC should be considered for inclusion in prostate cancer survivorship care guidelines.<br /> (Copyright © 2020 ISPOR–The Professional Society for Health Economics and Outcomes Research. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)
- Subjects :
- Adult
Aged
Aged, 80 and over
Antidepressive Agents economics
Antidepressive Agents therapeutic use
Cost-Benefit Analysis
Depression economics
Health Expenditures
Humans
Life Expectancy
Male
Middle Aged
Models, Theoretical
Psychotherapy economics
Psychotherapy methods
Quality of Life
Quality-Adjusted Life Years
United States
Depression etiology
Depression therapy
Prostatic Neoplasms complications
Subjects
Details
- Language :
- English
- ISSN :
- 1524-4733
- Volume :
- 24
- Issue :
- 2
- Database :
- MEDLINE
- Journal :
- Value in health : the journal of the International Society for Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research
- Publication Type :
- Academic Journal
- Accession number :
- 33518028
- Full Text :
- https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jval.2020.09.008