Back to Search
Start Over
The PINS Trial: a prospective randomized clinical trial comparing a traditional versus an emollient skincare regimen for the care of pin-sites in patients with circular frames.
- Source :
-
The bone & joint journal [Bone Joint J] 2021 Feb; Vol. 103-B (2), pp. 279-285. - Publication Year :
- 2021
-
Abstract
- Aims: Pin-site infection remains a significant problem for patients treated by external fixation. A randomized trial was undertaken to compare the weekly use of alcoholic chlorhexidine (CHX) for pin-site care with an emollient skin preparation in patients with a tibial fracture treated with a circular frame.<br />Methods: Patients were randomized to use either 0.5% CHX or Dermol (DML) 500 emollient pin-site care. A skin biopsy was taken from the tibia during surgery to measure the dermal and epidermal thickness and capillary, macrophage, and T-cell counts per high-powered field. The pH and hydration of the skin were measured preoperatively, at follow-up, and if pin-site infection occurred. Pin-site infection was defined using a validated clinical system.<br />Results: Out of 116 patients who were enrolled in the study, 23 patients (40%) in the CHX group and 26 (44%) in the DML group had at least one bad or ugly pin-site infection. This difference was not statistically significant (p = 0.71). There was no significant relationship between pH or hydration of the skin and pin-site infection. The epidermal thickness was found to be significantly greater in patients who had a pin-site infection compared with those who did not (p = 0.01). Skin irritation requiring a change of treatment occurred in four patients (7%) using CHX, and none using DML.<br />Conclusion: We found no significant difference in the incidence of pin-site infection between the CHX and DML treatment groups. Dermol appeared to offer a small but significant advantage in terms of tolerability. We did not find a significant association between patient or treatment related factors and pin-site infection. It is therefore difficult to make specific recommendations based upon these results. The use of either cleaning agent appears to be appropriate. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2021;103-B(2):279-285.
- Subjects :
- Adolescent
Adult
Aged
Aged, 80 and over
Anti-Infective Agents, Local therapeutic use
Chlorhexidine therapeutic use
Female
Follow-Up Studies
Fracture Fixation methods
Humans
Incidence
Male
Middle Aged
Prospective Studies
Prosthesis-Related Infections epidemiology
Single-Blind Method
Treatment Outcome
Young Adult
Bone Nails adverse effects
Emollients therapeutic use
External Fixators adverse effects
Fracture Fixation instrumentation
Postoperative Care methods
Prosthesis-Related Infections prevention & control
Tibial Fractures surgery
Subjects
Details
- Language :
- English
- ISSN :
- 2049-4408
- Volume :
- 103-B
- Issue :
- 2
- Database :
- MEDLINE
- Journal :
- The bone & joint journal
- Publication Type :
- Academic Journal
- Accession number :
- 33517738
- Full Text :
- https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620X.103B2.BJJ-2020-0680.R1