Back to Search Start Over

Treatment and Outcome in Stroke Patients With Acute M2 Occlusion and Minor Neurological Deficits.

Authors :
Dobrocky T
Piechowiak EI
Volbers B
Slavova N
Kaesmacher J
Meinel TR
Arnold M
Fischer U
Jung S
Gralla J
Mordasini P
Heldner MR
Source :
Stroke [Stroke] 2021 Mar; Vol. 52 (3), pp. 802-810. Date of Electronic Publication: 2021 Jan 26.
Publication Year :
2021

Abstract

Background and Purpose: Treatment in stroke patients with M2 segment occlusion of the middle cerebral artery presenting with mild neurological deficits is a matter of debate. The main purpose was to compare the outcome in patients with a minor stroke and a M2 occlusion.<br />Methods: Consecutive intravenous thrombolysis (IVT) eligible patients admitted to the Bernese stroke center between January 2005 and January 2020 with acute occlusion of the M2 segment and National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale score ≤5 were included. Outcome was compared between IVT only versus endovascular therapy (EVT) including intra-arterial thrombolysis and mechanical thrombectomy (MT; ±IVT) and between IVT only versus MT only.<br />Results: Among 169 patients (38.5% women, median age 70.2 years), 84 (49.7%) received IVT only and 85 (50.3%) EVT (±IVT), the latter including 39 (45.9%) treated with MT only. Groups were similar in sex, age, vascular risk factors, event cause, or preevent independency. Compared with IVT only, there was no difference in favorable outcome (modified Rankin Scale score, 0-2) for EVT (adjusted odds ratio, 0.96; adjusted P =0.935) or for MT only (adjusted odds ratio, 1.12; adjusted P =0.547) groups. Considering only patients treated after 2015, there was a significantly better 3-month modified Rankin Scale shift (adjusted P =0.032) in the EVT compared with the IVT only group.<br />Conclusions: Our study demonstrates similar effectiveness of IVT only versus EVT (±IVT), and of IVT only versus MT only in patients with peripheral middle cerebral artery occlusions and minor neurological deficits and indicates a possible benefit of EVT considering only patients treated after 2015. There is an unmet need for randomized controlled trials in this stroke field, including imaging parameters, and more sophisticated evaluation of National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale score subitems, neurocognition, and quality of life neglected by the standard outcome scales such as modified Rankin Scale and National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale score.

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
1524-4628
Volume :
52
Issue :
3
Database :
MEDLINE
Journal :
Stroke
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
33494637
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1161/STROKEAHA.120.031672