Back to Search Start Over

The Impact of a Standardized Pre-visit Laboratory Testing Panel in the Internal Medicine Outpatient Clinic: a Controlled "On-Off" Trial.

Authors :
Vrijsen BEL
Ten Berg MJ
Naaktgeboren CA
Vis JY
Dijstelbloem HM
Westerink J
Dekker D
Hoefer IE
Haitjema S
Hulsbergen-Veelken CAR
van Solinge WW
Kaasjager HAH
Source :
Journal of general internal medicine [J Gen Intern Med] 2021 Jul; Vol. 36 (7), pp. 1914-1920. Date of Electronic Publication: 2021 Jan 22.
Publication Year :
2021

Abstract

Background: In several settings, a shorter time to diagnosis has been shown to lead to improved clinical outcomes. The implementation of a rapid laboratory testing allows for a pre-visit testing in the outpatient clinic, meaning that test results are available during the first outpatient visit.<br />Objective: To determine whether the pre-visit laboratory testing leads to a shorter time to diagnosis in the general internal medicine outpatient clinic.<br />Design: An "on-off" trial, allocating subjects to one of two treatment arms in consecutive alternating blocks.<br />Participants: All new referrals to the internal medicine outpatient clinic of a university hospital were included, excluding second opinions. A total of 595 patients were eligible; one person declined to participate, leaving data from 594 patients for analysis.<br />Intervention: In the intervention group, patients had a standardized pre-visit laboratory testing before the first visit.<br />Main Measures: The primary outcome was the time to diagnosis. Secondary outcomes were the correctness of the preliminary diagnosis on the first day, health care utilization, and patient and physician satisfaction.<br />Key Results: There was no difference in time to diagnosis between the two groups (median 35 days vs 35 days; hazard ratio 1.03 [0.87-1.22]; p = .71). The pre-visit testing group had higher proportions of both correct preliminary diagnoses on day 1 (24% vs 14%; p = .003) and diagnostic workups being completed on day 1 (10% vs 3%; p < .001). The intervention group had more laboratory tests done (50.0 [interquartile range (IQR) 39.0-69.0] vs 43.0 [IQR 31.0-68.5]; p < .001). Otherwise, there were no differences between the groups.<br />Conclusions: Pre-visit testing did not lead to a shorter overall time to diagnosis. However, a greater proportion of patients had a correct diagnosis on the first day. Further studies should focus on customizing pre-visit laboratory panels, to improve their efficacy.<br />Trial Registration: NL5009.<br /> (© 2021. The Author(s).)

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
1525-1497
Volume :
36
Issue :
7
Database :
MEDLINE
Journal :
Journal of general internal medicine
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
33483828
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11606-020-06453-2