Back to Search Start Over

Recommendations on robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy: a Brazilian experts' consensus.

Authors :
Faria EF
Maciel CVM
Berger A
Mitre A
Dauster B
Freitas CH Jr
Fraga C
Chade D
Dall'Oglio M
Carvalho F
Campos F
Carvalhal GF
Lemos GC
GuimarĂ£es G
Zampolli H
Alves JR
Manzano JP
Fortes MA
Rocha MFH
Rubinstein M
Luz M
Romanelli P
Coelho R
Rocha R
Machado RD
Dos Reis RB
Zequi S
Guida R
Muglia V
Tobias-Machado M
Source :
Journal of robotic surgery [J Robot Surg] 2021 Dec; Vol. 15 (6), pp. 829-839. Date of Electronic Publication: 2021 Jan 11.
Publication Year :
2021

Abstract

Radical prostatectomy is a commonly adopted treatment for localized/locally advanced prostate cancer in men with a life expectancy of ten years or more. Robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP) is comparable to open radical prostatectomy on cancer control and complication rates; however, new evidence suggests that RARP may have better functional outcomes, especially with respect to urinary incontinence and erectile dysfunction. Some of the surgical steps of RARP are not adequately described in published literature and, as such, may have an impact on the final outcomes of the procedure. We organized a Brazilian experts' panel to evaluate best practices in RARP. The confection of the recommendations broadly involved: selection of the experts; establishment of working groups; systematic review of the literature and elaboration of a questionnaire; and construction of the final text with the approval of all participants. The participants reviewed the publications in English from December 2019 to February 2020. A one-round Delphi technique was employed in 188 questions. Five reviewers worked on the final recommendations using consensual and non-consensual questions. We found 59.9% of questions with greater than 70% agreement that were considered consensual. Non-consensual questions were reported according to the responses. The recommendations were based on evidence-based literature and individual perceptions adapted to the Brazilian reality, although some issues remain controversial. We believe that these recommendations may help urologists involved in RARP and hope that future discussions on this surgical procedure may evolve over the ensuing years.<br /> (© 2021. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag London Ltd. part of Springer Nature.)

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
1863-2491
Volume :
15
Issue :
6
Database :
MEDLINE
Journal :
Journal of robotic surgery
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
33426578
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11701-020-01186-0