Back to Search
Start Over
Anterior Bilateral Sacrospinous Fixation With Transvaginal Mesh: Is Hysterectomy a Risk Factor for Complications?
- Source :
-
Female pelvic medicine & reconstructive surgery [Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg] 2021 Oct 01; Vol. 27 (10), pp. 616-620. - Publication Year :
- 2021
-
Abstract
- Objectives: The aim of the study was to evaluate the effect of hysterectomy on the risk of complications from transvaginal pelvic organ prolapse surgery with mesh.<br />Methods: We conducted a retrospective cohort study between October 2010 and December 2017. Transvaginal mesh surgery was performed in patients with symptomatic anterior and/or apical prolapse (Pelvic Organ Prolapse Quantification ≥ stage 2). The primary outcome was rate of severe surgical complications based on the Clavien-Dindo classification (defined as grade ≥3), and the secondary outcome was the anatomical success at the last postoperative follow-up visit.<br />Results: Three hundred and ninety-six patients were included, 289 of these patients underwent anterior sacrospinous fixation with uterine preservation, 50 had a previous hysterectomy and 57 underwent a concomitant hysterectomy. The median follow-up was 12 months (interquartile range, 7 months). The rate of severe complications was 2.1%, 6.0%, and 5.3% in the uterine preservation group, previous hysterectomy group, and concomitant hysterectomy group, respectively (P = 0.2). The operative time was significantly higher in the concomitant hysterectomy group, and the mesh exposure rate was significantly higher in the previous hysterectomy group. The overall recurrence rate was 7.6%, with no differences between the study groups.<br />Conclusions: Concomitant and previous hysterectomy did not appear to increase the severe complication rate or anatomical failure after transvaginal mesh surgery. However, a history of hysterectomy appears to be a risk factor for vaginal mesh exposure. This must be considered in the choice between prosthetic and autologous management options for the treatment of posthysterectomy vault prolapse.<br />Competing Interests: R.dT. and B.F. are consultants for Boston Scientific. The other authors have declared that they have no conflicts of interest.<br /> (Copyright © 2021 American Urogynecologic Society. All rights reserved.)
Details
- Language :
- English
- ISSN :
- 2154-4212
- Volume :
- 27
- Issue :
- 10
- Database :
- MEDLINE
- Journal :
- Female pelvic medicine & reconstructive surgery
- Publication Type :
- Academic Journal
- Accession number :
- 33411457
- Full Text :
- https://doi.org/10.1097/SPV.0000000000001006