Back to Search Start Over

80 questions for UK biological security.

Authors :
Kemp L
Aldridge DC
Booy O
Bower H
Browne D
Burgmann M
Burt A
Cunningham AA
Dando M
Dick JTA
Dye C
Weiss Evans S
Gallardo B
Godfray HCJ
Goodfellow I
Gubbins S
Holt LA
Jones KE
Kandil H
Martin P
McCaughan M
McLeish C
Meany T
Millett K
ÓhÉigeartaigh SS
Patron NJ
Rhodes C
Roy HE
Shackelford G
Smith D
Spence N
Steiner H
Sundaram LS
Voeneky S
Walker JR
Watkins H
Whitby S
Wood J
Sutherland WJ
Source :
PloS one [PLoS One] 2021 Jan 06; Vol. 16 (1), pp. e0241190. Date of Electronic Publication: 2021 Jan 06 (Print Publication: 2021).
Publication Year :
2021

Abstract

Multiple national and international trends and drivers are radically changing what biological security means for the United Kingdom (UK). New technologies present novel opportunities and challenges, and globalisation has created new pathways and increased the speed, volume and routes by which organisms can spread. The UK Biological Security Strategy (2018) acknowledges the importance of research on biological security in the UK. Given the breadth of potential research, a targeted agenda identifying the questions most critical to effective and coordinated progress in different disciplines of biological security is required. We used expert elicitation to generate 80 policy-relevant research questions considered by participants to have the greatest impact on UK biological security. Drawing on a collaboratively-developed set of 450 questions, proposed by 41 experts from academia, industry and the UK government (consulting 168 additional experts) we subdivided the final 80 questions into six categories: bioengineering; communication and behaviour; disease threats (including pandemics); governance and policy; invasive alien species; and securing biological materials and securing against misuse. Initially, the questions were ranked through a voting process and then reduced and refined to 80 during a one-day workshop with 35 participants from a variety of disciplines. Consistently emerging themes included: the nature of current and potential biological security threats, the efficacy of existing management actions, and the most appropriate future options. The resulting questions offer a research agenda for biological security in the UK that can assist the targeting of research resources and inform the implementation of the UK Biological Security Strategy. These questions include research that could aid with the mitigation of Covid-19, and preparation for the next pandemic. We hope that our structured and rigorous approach to creating a biological security research agenda will be replicated in other countries and regions. The world, not just the UK, is in need of a thoughtful approach to directing biological security research to tackle the emerging issues.<br />Competing Interests: Authors TM and HS are affiliated with Opencell. KM is affiliated with Biosecure Ltd. Arcadia provided support in the form of salaries for authors WS and CR. There are no patents, products in development or marketed products to declare. This does not alter our adherence to PLOS ONE policies on sharing data and materials.

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
1932-6203
Volume :
16
Issue :
1
Database :
MEDLINE
Journal :
PloS one
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
33406134
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0241190