Back to Search Start Over

Delayed graft function and acute rejection following HLA-incompatible living donor kidney transplantation.

Authors :
Motter JD
Jackson KR
Long JJ
Waldram MM
Orandi BJ
Montgomery RA
Stegall MD
Jordan SC
Benedetti E
Dunn TB
Ratner LE
Kapur S
Pelletier RP
Roberts JP
Melcher ML
Singh P
Sudan DL
Posner MP
El-Amm JM
Shapiro R
Cooper M
Verbesey JE
Lipkowitz GS
Rees MA
Marsh CL
Sankari BR
Gerber DA
Wellen JR
Bozorgzadeh A
Gaber AO
Heher EC
Weng FL
Djamali A
Helderman JH
Concepcion BP
Brayman KL
Oberholzer J
Kozlowski T
Covarrubias K
Massie AB
Segev DL
Garonzik-Wang JM
Source :
American journal of transplantation : official journal of the American Society of Transplantation and the American Society of Transplant Surgeons [Am J Transplant] 2021 Apr; Vol. 21 (4), pp. 1612-1621. Date of Electronic Publication: 2021 Feb 27.
Publication Year :
2021

Abstract

Incompatible living donor kidney transplant recipients (ILDKTr) have pre-existing donor-specific antibody (DSA) that, despite desensitization, may persist or reappear with resulting consequences, including delayed graft function (DGF) and acute rejection (AR). To quantify the risk of DGF and AR in ILDKT and downstream effects, we compared 1406 ILDKTr to 17 542 compatible LDKT recipients (CLDKTr) using a 25-center cohort with novel SRTR linkage. We characterized DSA strength as positive Luminex, negative flow crossmatch (PLNF); positive flow, negative cytotoxic crossmatch (PFNC); or positive cytotoxic crossmatch (PCC). DGF occurred in 3.1% of CLDKT, 3.5% of PLNF, 5.7% of PFNC, and 7.6% of PCC recipients, which translated to higher DGF for PCC recipients (aOR =  <subscript>1.03</subscript> 1.68 <subscript>2.72</subscript> ). However, the impact of DGF on mortality and DCGF risk was no higher for ILDKT than CLDKT (p interaction > .1). AR developed in 8.4% of CLDKT, 18.2% of PLNF, 21.3% of PFNC, and 21.7% of PCC recipients, which translated to higher AR (aOR PLNF =  <subscript>1.45</subscript> 2.09 <subscript>3.02</subscript> ; PFNC =  <subscript>1.67</subscript> 2.40 <subscript>3.46</subscript> ; PCC =  <subscript>1.48</subscript> 2.24 <subscript>3.37</subscript> ). Although the impact of AR on mortality was no higher for ILDKT than CLDKT (p interaction = .1), its impact on DCGF risk was less consequential for ILDKT (aHR =  <subscript>1.34</subscript> 1.62 <subscript>1.95</subscript> ) than CLDKT (aHR =  <subscript>1.96</subscript> 2.29 <subscript>2.67</subscript> ) (p interaction = .004). Providers should consider these risks during preoperative counseling, and strategies to mitigate them should be considered.<br /> (© 2020 The American Society of Transplantation and the American Society of Transplant Surgeons.)

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
1600-6143
Volume :
21
Issue :
4
Database :
MEDLINE
Journal :
American journal of transplantation : official journal of the American Society of Transplantation and the American Society of Transplant Surgeons
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
33370502
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1111/ajt.16471