Cite
Why the categorization of indexed effective orifice area is not justified for the classification of prosthesis-patient mismatch.
MLA
Vriesendorp, Michiel D., et al. “Why the Categorization of Indexed Effective Orifice Area Is Not Justified for the Classification of Prosthesis-Patient Mismatch.” The Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, vol. 164, no. 3, Sept. 2022, p. 822. EBSCOhost, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtcvs.2020.10.123.
APA
Vriesendorp, M. D., Deeb, G. M., Reardon, M. J., Kiaii, B., Bapat, V., Labrousse, L., Rao, V., Sabik, J. F., 3rd, Gearhart, E., & Klautz, R. J. M. (2022). Why the categorization of indexed effective orifice area is not justified for the classification of prosthesis-patient mismatch. The Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, 164(3), 822. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtcvs.2020.10.123
Chicago
Vriesendorp, Michiel D, G Michael Deeb, Michael J Reardon, Bob Kiaii, Vinayak Bapat, Louis Labrousse, Vivek Rao, Joseph F Sabik 3rd, Elizabeth Gearhart, and Robert J M Klautz. 2022. “Why the Categorization of Indexed Effective Orifice Area Is Not Justified for the Classification of Prosthesis-Patient Mismatch.” The Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery 164 (3): 822. doi:10.1016/j.jtcvs.2020.10.123.